atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

BirdCollect: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Analyzing Dense Bird Flock Attributes

AAAI 2024 · Detection and segmentation › Open-set and few-shot detection · approach: Remote sensing segmentation and change · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces BirdCollect, a ~46 GB benchmark of manually annotated dense bird flock images (Demoiselle Cranes in Khichan and 34 species in Bharatpur) and benchmarks crowd counting, density estimation, segmentation, and species classification methods.

Problem

Existing bird datasets contain low-density, crowd-sourced annotations and few birds per image, limiting automated monitoring of dense, species-rich bird flocks in uncontrolled outdoor imagery.

Approach

A large, manually point-annotated, high-density bird flock dataset from two field sites with varied cameras and resolutions, plus SAM-based pseudo segmentation masks, and benchmark results across counting, density, segmentation and fine-grained species classification tasks.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use Diffuse Denoise-Count instead of CANBird counting · (K, S1)MAE: 29.37 -> 26.18Helped
Use Diffuse Denoise-Count instead of CSRNetBird counting · (K, S1)MAE: 28.12 -> 26.18Helped
Use Diffuse Denoise-Count instead of DMCountBird counting · (K, S1)MAE: 27.44 -> 26.18Helped
Use Diffuse Denoise-Count instead of CANBird counting · (K, S1)RMSE: 44.65 -> 41.24Helped
Use OneFormer instead of Mask2FormerBird segmentation · (K, S1)mIoU: 0.24 -> 0.76Helped
Use OneFormer instead of ClipSegBird segmentation · (K, S1)mIoU: 0.6 -> 0.76Helped
Use SAM with point annotations instead of Grounded Dino + SAMBird segmentation · (K, S1)mIoU: 0.49 -> 0.76Helped
Use OneFormer instead of Mask2FormerBird segmentation · (B, S2)mIoU: 0.56 -> 0.94Helped
Use OneFormer instead of ClipSegBird segmentation · (B, S2)mIoU: 0.77 -> 0.94Helped
Use OneFormer instead of SAM + Point AnnotationBird segmentation · (B, S2)mIoU: 0.88 -> 0.94Helped
Use HERBS instead of PMGBird species classification · (B, S2)accuracy: 66.67 -> 82.11%Helped
Use HERBS instead of MC LossBird species classification · (B, S2)accuracy: 72.10 -> 82.11%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: BirdCollect (Demoiselle Crane subset K,S1 and Bharatpur species subset B,S2)

Benchmarks: BirdCollect

Metrics: MAE RMSE mIoU accuracy

Baselines: CAN CSRNet P2P-Net M-SFANet DM-Count CrowdFormer Diffuse-Denoise-Count Mask2Former SegFormer ClipSeg OneFormer SAM

Builds on: Segment Anything (SAM) DM-Count Diffuse-Denoise-Count Mask2Former OneFormer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy