AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Submodular and game algorithms

Optimal Spot-Checking for Improving Evaluation Accuracy of Peer Grading Systems

AAAI 2018 · Learning theory and algorithms › Submodular and game algorithms · approach: Matching markets and welfare · 16 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use PASC instead of random spot-checking allocationspot-checking policy · Synthetic, K=100, l=4accuracy rate: 0.577 -> 0.770Helped
use PASC instead of assignment-oriented greedy ASCspot-checking policy · Synthetic, K=100, l=16accuracy rate: 0.597 -> 0.900Helped
use PASC instead of ASC when budget exceeds critical budgetspot-checking policy · Synthetic, K=500, l=4accuracy rate: 0.956 -> 0.956No clear effect
add pre-step assignment allocation by reliability groups (AAF) over RandomRandom spot-checking · Synthetic, K=100, l=4accuracy rate: 0.577 -> 0.581Helped
increase load l from 4 to 16ASC · Synthetic, K=100accuracy rate: 0.625 -> 0.597Hurt
increase load l from 4 to 16PASC · Synthetic, K=100accuracy rate: 0.770 -> 0.900Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy