atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Games and equilibria

Strategyproof Peer Selection: Mechanisms, Analyses, and Experiments

AAAI 2016 · Multi-agent systems and games › Games and equilibria · approach: Strategic classification · 37 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use Dollar Partition instead of Partition (adaptive per-cluster quotas)strategyproof peer selection · NSF-like simulation, A+|A grades, worst caseagents of top grades selected: 9/11 -> 10/11Helped
use Dollar Partition instead of Partition (adaptive per-cluster quotas)strategyproof peer selection · NSF-like simulation, A+|A|B+ grades, worst caseagents of top grades selected: 17/26 -> 20/26Helped
use Dollar Partition instead of Partition in low-information setting (m <= 5)strategyproof peer selection · NSF-like simulation, average selectionmean cumulative grade selectionHurt
increase number of clustersDollar Partition vs Partition · simulationrelative performanceHelped
vary Mallows dispersion phi in {0.0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.4}peer selection mechanisms · NSF-like simulationmean cumulative grade selectionNo clear effect
vary k, number of clusters, grade distribution D and scoring Fpeer selection mechanisms · simulationmechanism rankingNo clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy