atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Combinatorial and search optimization

Improving Domain-Independent Planning via Critical Section Macro-Operators

AAAI 2019 · Learning theory and algorithms › Combinatorial and search optimization · approach: Classical and HTN planning · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add Critical Section Macros (conservative) instead of BloMa macrosplanners on IPC learning domains · PAR10, MUM methodologyPAR10 / coverage: 72%Helped
add Critical Section Macros (conservative) instead of BloMa macrosplanners on IPC learning domains · PAR10, BloMa methodologyPAR10 / coverage: 63%Helped
use Critical Section Macros instead of MUM macrosplanners on IPC learning domains · PAR10PAR10 / coverage: 50%Mixed
combine Critical Section Macros with MUM (ablation)planners on IPC learning domains · PAR10PAR10 / coverage: 60%Helped
remove original operators replaced by macros (aggressive variant) (ablation)Critical Section Macros · PAR10PAR10 / coverage: 90%Helped
add Critical Section MacrosLAMA · Barman coveragePAR10 / coverage: 2 -> 30Helped
learn macros from best-quality training plans (BloMa methodology) instead of planner's own plans (ablation)Critical Section Macros · IPC domainsPAR10 / coverageHelped
add Critical Section Macros in Roversplanners · RoversPAR10 / coverageNo clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy