atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Perturbating, Tuning, and Collaborating: Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for Single Domain Generalization on Medical Imaging

AAAI 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Foundation-model domain generalization · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CollaSU-SDG, a framework that combines a SAM-based vision foundation model with a specialized U-Net via frequency perturbation, a domain expansion adapter, hierarchical feature transfer, and dense prompts for single-source domain generalization in medical segmentation.

Problem

Single-source domain generalization (SDG) for medical image segmentation, where models trained on one source domain must generalize to unseen target domains, and where SAM-style foundation models need explicit prompts and adaptation to medical domains.

Approach

Jointly trains a specialized U-Net and a SAM-based universal model with model-aware adaptive frequency perturbation injected into both, adapters tuning the ViT for medical data, adaptive hierarchical transfer of universal features into the specialized decoder, and dynamic dense prompts from the specialized model replacing manual SAM prompts.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add the full CollaSU-SDG frameworkSAM-b + ResNet34 U-Net · Prostate segmentation, average across D1-D6DSC: 72.58 -> 81.29Helped
add the full CollaSU-SDG frameworkSAM-b + ResNet34 U-Net · Fundus optical disc segmentation, average across D1-D5DSC: 82.23 -> 90.10Helped
add the full CollaSU-SDG frameworkSAM-b + ResNet34 U-Net · Fundus optical cup segmentation, average across D1-D5DSC: 69.23 -> 77.89Helped
add the full CollaSU-SDG frameworkSAM-b + ResNet34 U-Net · Polyp segmentation, average across D1-D4DSC: 73.65 -> 79.32Helped
add the full CollaSU-SDG frameworkSAM-b + ResNet34 U-Net · Polyp segmentation, average across D1-D4Emaxθ: 82.74 -> 88.55Helped
add the full CollaSU-SDG frameworkSAM-b + ResNet34 U-Net · Polyp segmentation, average across D1-D4Sα: 80.58 -> 83.92Helped
add EDA, MPIS, MPIU, and AHT to DDP (ablation)CollaSU-SDG · Fundus segmentationDSC: 82.23 -> 84.00Helped
add EDA, MPIS, MPIU, and AHT to DDP (ablation)CollaSU-SDG · Prostate segmentationDSC: 79.13 -> 81.29Helped
add MPIS, MPIU, and AHT to EDA and DDP (ablation)CollaSU-SDG · Fundus segmentationDSC: 82.57 -> 84.00Helped
add MPIS, MPIU, and AHT to EDA and DDP (ablation)CollaSU-SDG · Prostate segmentationDSC: 79.63 -> 81.29Helped
add EDA, MPIU, and AHT to MPIS and DDP (ablation)CollaSU-SDG · Fundus segmentationDSC: 82.38 -> 84.00Helped
add EDA, MPIU, and AHT to MPIS and DDP (ablation)CollaSU-SDG · Prostate segmentationDSC: 79.38 -> 81.29Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Prostate segmentation dataset (six domains) Fundus optic disc/cup dataset (five domains) Polyp segmentation dataset (four domains)

Benchmarks: Prostate segmentation Fundus optic disc/cup segmentation Polyp segmentation

Metrics: DSC ASD E-max S-alpha

Baselines: ERM MixStyle MAD DSU TriD CSDG MaxStyle SLAug SAM-full MedSAM-full EFDM SAN-SAW

Builds on: SAM MixStyle LoRA Rein MedSAM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy