atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Noise-Resilient Symbolic Regression with Dynamic Gating Reinforcement Learning

AAAI 2025 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Hierarchical skills and priors · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes NRSR, an RL-based symbolic regression method with an L0 noise-resilient gating module that masks irrelevant input variables and a mixed path entropy bonus, outperforming DSR, HESL, GP-Meld, DGSR and Eureqa on noisy and clean Nguyen benchmarks.

Problem

Symbolic regression struggles to recover correct expressions from data containing many irrelevant (noisy) input variables, which inflates the search space; most SR benchmarks are clean.

Approach

Train an L0-regularized gating layer to select relevant input variables and fold the gates into the RL policy's action mask, combined with a mixed path entropy bonus (single-step hierarchical entropy plus whole-sequence path entropy) and PPO with a quantile-filtered baseline.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add NGM (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, 10 noisy inputsRR: 32.9% -> 89.1%Helped
add NGM (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, 10 noisy inputsEEN: 1.45M -> 423KHelped
add NGM (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, 10 noisy inputsNMSE: 0.093 -> 8.52e-3Helped
add MPE (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, clean dataRR: 85.3% -> 89.7%Helped
add MPE (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, clean dataEEN: 431K -> 408KHelped
add MPE (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, clean dataNMSE: 5.98e-3 -> 7.66e-3Mixed
add PPO (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, clean dataRR: 86.7% -> 89.7%Helped
add PPO (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, clean dataEEN: 462K -> 408KHelped
add PPO (ablation)NRSR · Nguyen benchmarks, clean dataNMSE: 8.92e-3 -> 7.66e-3Helped
use averaged gating layer with Otsu threshold instead of final-epoch gates (ablation)NGM · NGM test expressionsAccuracy: 60.21% -> 98.92%Helped
scale Otsu threshold to 1.05 (ablation)NGM · NGM test expressions, 10 noisy inputsAccuracy: 95.70% -> 98.92%Helped
scale Otsu threshold from 1.05 to 1.1 (ablation)NGM · NGM test expressions, 10 noisy inputsAccuracy: 98.92% -> 94.62%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Nguyen SR benchmark suite (12 expressions)

Benchmarks: Nguyen-1 to Nguyen-12 with 5 noise variables Nguyen-1 to Nguyen-12 with 10 noise variables Nguyen-1 to Nguyen-12 clean

Metrics: recovery rate (RR) explored expression number (EEN) normalized mean-square error (NMSE) effective exploration ratio (EER) gate filter accuracy

Baselines: DSR HESL GP-Meld DGSR Eureqa

Builds on: DSR (deep symbolic regression) PPO hierarchical entropy regularization (HESL) GP-Meld Gumbel-softmax / binary concrete L0 relaxation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy