AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

Preference tuning against hallucination

Trains models with preference optimization and targeted data to suppress hallucinated content and locate its causes.

58 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2024–2026) · an approach in Multimodal LLMs, keyword cluster “hallucination · lvlms · mitigating”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

6 papers in 2023–24 and 52 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 2.9% to 2.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 0212022: 0222023: 0232024: 6242025: 22252026: 3026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

27 papers here report 337 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 68%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 26%, mixed 1%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Marking analysis as dispreferred class in FDPO (DA) vs ignoring itM-HalDetect human eval · Human Eval (fraction truthful)IA 0.83 vs DA 0.70 at T=0; IA 0.75 vs DA 0.58 at T=1HurtDetecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models (AAAI 2024 · 145 citations)
Use consistency threshold 0.5 instead of no HalluciDoctorhallucination evaluation · average CHAIR21.7 -> 13.8HelpedHalluciDoctor: Mitigating Hallucinatory Toxicity in Visual Instruction Data (CVPR 2024 · 48 citations)
remove co-occurrence factor from revisor trainingMSCOCO CHAIR_S · CHAIR_S19.7 to 22.6HurtAnalyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (ICLR 2024 · 29 citations)
Apply attention intervention in layers 0-4 instead of layers 5-18COCO 2014 val · CHAIRS (CS)25.0 -> 31.0HurtDevils in Middle Layers of Large Vision-Language Models: Interpreting, Detecting and Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Attention Lens (CVPR 2025 · 18 citations)
Restrict attention redistribution to visual-perception headsNoCaps · CIDEr76.4 -> 78.8HelpedClearSight: Visual Signal Enhancement for Object Hallucination Mitigation in Multimodal Large Language Models (CVPR 2025 · 14 citations)
Add target identification/visual perception and visual perception verificationPhD misleading OR · accuracy26.6 -> 35.4HelpedCombating Multimodal LLM Hallucination via Bottom-Up Holistic Reasoning (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)
add CBTMCHAIR-COCO · CHAIR_S33.4 -> 18.6HelpedAlleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Hallucination-Induced Optimization (NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations)
add On-Policy Alignment before DPOAMBER · HalRate22.6 -> 11.6HelpedMitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via DPO: On-Policy Data Hold the Key (CVPR 2025 · 6 citations)
randomly select among three CD strategies at each generation stepAMBER · CHAIR8.0 -> 6.9HelpedOctopus: Alleviating Hallucination via Dynamic Contrastive Decoding (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
add visual-aware token selectionMSCOCO CHAIR · CHAIR_i6.43 -> 5.82HelpedVASparse: Towards Efficient Visual Hallucination Mitigation via Visual-Aware Token Sparsification (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
Use DETR and RAM++ together rather than DETR aloneMSCOCO · CHAIR_S27.6 -> 17.8HelpedMitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Image-Grounded Guidance (ICML 2025 · 4 citations)
Add hallucination-aware trainingAMBER-G · CHAIR7.8 -> 7.2HelpedGenerate, but Verify: Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models with Retrospective Resampling (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 52 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MSCOCO · 12 of 52 papers
  • AMBER · 10 of 52 papers
  • POPE · 9 of 52 papers
  • A-OKVQA · 8 of 52 papers
  • GQA · 8 of 52 papers
  • MME · 8 of 52 papers
  • RLHF-V · 6 of 52 papers
  • MMHal-Bench · 5 of 52 papers

Baselines

  • VCD · 27 of 52 papers
  • OPERA · 19 of 52 papers
  • HA-DPO · 10 of 52 papers
  • ICD · 9 of 52 papers
  • PAI · 9 of 52 papers
  • HALVA · 8 of 52 papers
  • DoLa · 8 of 52 papers
  • POVID · 7 of 52 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 58 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 20 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy