AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Policy gradient and actor-critic

Importance-weighted OPE estimators

Build doubly robust and marginalized importance-sampling estimators for off-policy evaluation.

57 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Policy gradient and actor-critic, keyword cluster “ope · estimators · importance”

State History Tried Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

13 papers in 2023–24 and 9 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 3.8% to 1.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 1172018: 3182019: 7192020: 13202021: 6212022: 3222023: 7232024: 6242025: 4252026: 526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

50 papers here report 418 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 19%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add the one-standard-error rule to standard 10-fold OCV-DR with a 90/10 splitAverage across all datasets · MSEHelpedCross-Validated Off-Policy Evaluation (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
add behavior-policy cross-entropy loss to transition-only trainingSimulated dynamic process, policies A and B · LMSE4.72 -> 4.23; 5.14 -> 4.47HelpedTwo-way Deconfounder for Off-policy Evaluation in Causal Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Increase empirical moment order from L=1 to L>1 using the optimal regularizeroffline contextual bandit risk evaluation · upper-bound tightnessHelpedLogarithmic Smoothing for Pessimistic Off-Policy Evaluation, Selection and Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
add learned kernel metricPendulum with dummy dim · RMSE0.250 ± 0.032 -> 0.115 ± 0.018HelpedKernel Metric Learning for In-Sample Off-Policy Evaluation of Deterministic RL Policies (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
Add the action-advantage correction (DAE) to UncorrectedDeterministic MinAtar environments · policy scoreHelpedSkill or Luck? Return Decomposition via Advantage Functions (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 22 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 35 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy