AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

Sample complexity of learning distributions

Derives sample bounds for learning Gaussians, simplices and predictors, including gradient-based algorithms.

101 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Sample complexity, keyword cluster “sample complexity · pac · optimal sample”

State History Tried Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

26 papers in 2023–24 and 22 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.8% to 6.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 5172018: 9182019: 5192020: 11202021: 19212022: 3222023: 11232024: 15242025: 13252026: 926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

82 papers here report 432 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 68%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 15%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Orthogonalize initial hidden weights to have overlap 1 / \sqrt d with the spikeSpiked Wishart and spiked cumulant models · distinguishability1 / \sqrt dNo clear effectLearning from higher-order correlations, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Train on low-discrepancy sequence points instead of uniformly random pointsTwo-dimensional random Heisenberg model, 20–45 qubits · prediction RMSENo clear effectPredicting Ground State Properties: Constant Sample Complexity and Deep Learning Algorithms (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Use K1=4 and K2=3 instead of K1=2 and K2=1Synthetic Gaussian Wigner graphs, n=50, ρ=0.99 · Correlation detection performanceHelpedSample Complexity of Correlation Detection in the Gaussian Wigner Model (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use the input norm ‖x‖₂ rather than only the normalized directionGaussian SIM · runtimed^{{\rm sk}_\star} -> d^{{\rm sk}_\star/2+1}HelpedLearning single index models via harmonic decomposition (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use prior-matched sparse perturbations rather than a polynomial-size cover of the sparse priork-sparse prior · sample complexity\tilde{O}(k^{s^\star} \cdot d / k^2)HurtCan Neural Networks Achieve Optimal Computational-statistical Tradeoff? An Analysis on Single-Index Model (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 48 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy