AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Optimal transport

Transport map estimation

Estimate and regularize transport maps with statistical and low-rank guarantees.

77 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Optimal transport, keyword cluster “optimal transport · transport ot · sinkhorn”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 22 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 34.5% to 15.5%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 0182019: 4192020: 7202021: 4212022: 10222023: 12232024: 17242025: 9252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

59 papers here report 481 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 19%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add barycenter reweightingGaussian mixture synthetic clustering · Top-1 accuracy88.00% -> 100.00%HelpedDouble-Bounded Optimal Transport for Advanced Clustering and Classification (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
add latent noise z to the class-guided transport mapFMNIST → MNIST · accuracy82.79 -> 83.22HelpedNeural Optimal Transport with General Cost Functionals (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
recompute MST projections throughout training rather than skipping them until the final iterationNoisy random tree, σ=5 · Wasserstein error0.279 ± 0.102 -> 0.262 ± 0.102HelpedLearning Ultrametric Trees for Optimal Transport Regression (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
Replace the uniform cubic partition with a non-uniform partitionDistributions where μ has bounded 2p-th moments · expected transportation error (E_p)\widetilde{O} (p,d)\bigl(n^{-1/(d+2p)}\bigr)HelpedEstimation of Stochastic Optimal Transport Maps (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use Beta (2,2) time sampling instead of uniformWild→Cat (64x64) · FID10.72 -> 12.46HurtImproving Neural Optimal Transport via Displacement Interpolation (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase temperature parameter τPoint Cloud MNIST 2D interpolation · mass splittingHelpedExpected Sliced Transport Plans (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use GST-Φ1 instead of GST-Φ0TWITTER, RECIPE, CLASSIC, AMAZON · classification performanceHelpedGeneralized Sobolev Transport for Probability Measures on a Graph (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
optimize marginal distributions with L_M rather than transport plans with L_TSynthetic linear perturbation, L2 cost · L20.45 -> 0.41HelpedQuantum Theory and Application of Contextual Optimal Transport (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
use ε-KL cost functions instead of classical cost functionsAve, celeba! manifold k=1, k=2, and k=3 · FID30.7 -> 34.5; 31.0 -> 34.9; 31.7 -> 35.7HurtEstimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal Transport (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
increase expectile τ from 0.5 to 0.9Synthetic 2D · W233.47 -> 0.06HelpedExpectile Regularization for Fast and Accurate Training of Neural Optimal Transport (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Vary the step-length schedule (accelerated, constant-speed, or decelerated)Synthetic data and sci-Plex · Sinkhorn divergenceNo clear effectProgressive Entropic Optimal Transport Solvers (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Increase the share of displacement inertia captured by the p* subspaceSynthetic ground-truth subspace recovery · Normalized squared-residual errorHelpedLearning Elastic Costs to Shape Monge Displacements (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 14 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 5 of 14 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 14 papers

Baselines

  • OTM · 2 of 14 papers
  • DSBM · 2 of 14 papers
  • ASBM · 2 of 14 papers
  • Sinkhorn · 2 of 14 papers
  • ProgOT · 2 of 14 papers
  • LOT · 2 of 14 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 51 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy