AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / OOD and anomaly detection

Anomaly detection with contaminated data

Handles noisy training data and distribution shifts using clustering, ensembles and outlier exposure.

64 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in OOD and anomaly detection, keyword cluster “anomaly detection · normal · anomalies”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

16 papers in 2023–24 and 32 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 7.5% to 12.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 0182019: 3192020: 5202021: 0212022: 7222023: 8232024: 8242025: 11252026: 2126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

37 papers here report 366 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 21%, mixed 9%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add HADG-generated heterogeneous distributions and CDLAITEX, general setting, 10 examples · AUC0.892±0.007 -> 0.916±0.004HelpedAnomaly Heterogeneity Learning for Open-set Supervised Anomaly Detection (CVPR 2024 · 37 citations)
Increase Qsco circuit depth from ℓ = 2 to ℓ = 3General setting, 10 training anomalies across datasets · AUCMixedQsco: A Quantum Scoring Module for Open-Set Supervised Anomaly Detection (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)
use MEBin instead of fixed-threshold or Otsu binarizationMVTec AD · F10.499 -> 0.712HelpedAnomalyNCD: Towards Novel Anomaly Class Discovery in Industrial Scenarios (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)
add pseudo-abnormal samples during trainingAdult, MCAR, mr=0.2 · AUROC65.30 (4.36) -> 76.51 (2.12)HelpedUnsupervised Anomaly Detection in The Presence of Missing Values (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Add GBDCIC-IDS · TP0.9422 -> 0.9979 (↑0.0557)HelpedDissect Black Box: Interpreting for Rule-Based Explanations in Unsupervised Anomaly Detection (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Vary contamination ratio from 5% to 15%Visual AD datasets · AUROCNo clear effectAn Evidence-Based Post-Hoc Adjustment Framework for Anomaly Detection Under Data Contamination (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
use vector summation instead of the scalar anomaly score30 tabular datasets · Avg. Rank (AUC-ROC)3.7 -> 2.6HelpedTowards a Unified Framework of Clustering-based Anomaly Detection (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add supervised cross-entropy loss to the contrastive objectiveScientific datasets · Embedding structure and class separationHelpedAutoSciDACT: Automated Scientific Discovery through Contrastive Embedding and Hypothesis Testing (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Sample K = 6 detectors per time step instead of querying all detectorsOzone · runtime (s)1746.19 -> 1002.05HelpedSEAD: Unsupervised Ensemble of Streaming Anomaly Detectors (ICML 2025)
Add auxiliary concept values to the promptsColored MNIST: Number · AUROC98.8 -> 98.5No clear effectLanguage-Assisted Feature Transformation for Anomaly Detection (ICLR 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 19 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MVTec AD · 4 of 19 papers
  • CelebA · 3 of 19 papers
  • ViSA · 2 of 19 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 19 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 19 papers

Baselines

  • LOF · 4 of 19 papers
  • kNN · 3 of 19 papers
  • DeepSVDD · 3 of 19 papers
  • DevNet · 2 of 19 papers
  • OCSVM · 2 of 19 papers
  • IForest · 2 of 19 papers
  • DAGMM · 2 of 19 papers
  • ECOD · 2 of 19 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 48 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 36 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy