AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Class-incremental

Few-shot class-incremental prototypes

Adds new classes from few samples using prototype calibration, meta-learning and orthogonal features.

47 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Class-incremental, keyword cluster “shot · incremental cil · feature”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 1 of 1 tracked benchmark.

13 papers in 2023–24 and 17 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 14.1% to 12.6%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 1192020: 1202021: 7212022: 8222023: 9232024: 4242025: 9252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CUB200 session 10 · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2025 · still improving

2021: 52.282023: 62.52025: 84.8
20212025

What has been tried

35 papers here report 389 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 76%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 16%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add ORTH to PSCL + CEmini-ImageNet · aHM36.17 -> 58.12HelpedOrCo: Towards Better Generalization via Orthogonality and Contrast for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (CVPR 2024 · 45 citations)
Add base-session pretraining before the self-distillation stageCUB200 session 10 · accuracy52.37 -> 60.96HelpedM2SD:Multiple Mixing Self-Distillation for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (AAAI 2024 · 14 citations)
Add adaptive decision boundary without inter-class constraintminiImageNet · session 8 accuracy50.81 -> 54.67HelpedAdaptive Decision Boundary for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
add novel-novel diversity criteria for selecting pseudo novel classesCUB200 · performance dropping (PD)16.41% vs. 17.43%HelpedPseudo Informative Episode Construction for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Replace Coda-Prompt with D-Prompt and Adaptive Hierarchical QueryImageNet-R session 10 · accuracy66.4 -> 73.1HelpedSEC-Prompt:SEmantic Complementary Prompting for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
Add MeCs for prototype constructionCoraFull, CS, and Computers · accuracyHelpedAn Efficient Memory Module for Graph Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Vary base-session anchor selection among closest-to-prototype, k-means, and random-closest strategies instead of random samplingBCI-IV 2a, Session 2 · Macro-F1 (All Classes)37.04±1.24; 38.65 ± 1.26; 36.97±1.28; 38.36±1.34; 38.55±1.30; 38.05±1.61MixedAnchorInv: Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning of Physiological Signals via Feature Space-Guided Inversion (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Add inference metric alteration (IM)CIFAR100, session 8 · incremental class accuracy (%)15.45 -> 22.18HelpedAttraction Diminishing and Distributing for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use Tri-WE with φ0, φold, and φall instead of no weight-space ensembleminiImageNet · average accuracy (%)67.92 -> 70.62HelpedTripartite Weight-Space Ensemble for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
add PAMMD rewardCIFAR-100 · last-session accuracy improvement (%)+1.24HelpedDiffusion-Classifier Synergy: Reward-Aligned Learning via Mutual Boosting Loop for FSCIL (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
add the composition moduleCUB200 last incremental session · Overall accuracy57.18 -> 59.25HelpedCompositional Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 9 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR100 · 6 of 9 papers
  • miniImageNet · 5 of 9 papers
  • CUB200 · 5 of 9 papers

Baselines

  • TEEN · 5 of 9 papers
  • TOPIC · 4 of 9 papers
  • CEC · 4 of 9 papers
  • FACT · 4 of 9 papers
  • NC-FSCIL · 4 of 9 papers
  • SAVC · 4 of 9 papers
  • SoftNet · 3 of 9 papers
  • DyCR · 3 of 9 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 30 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy