AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Mixture of experts

Expert routing and specialization

Improves expert specialization, soft routing, and interpretation in mixture-of-experts models.

150 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2021–2026) · an approach in Mixture of experts, keyword cluster “sparse · scaling · moes”

State History Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

20 papers in 2023–24 and 121 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 51.3% to 50.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 2212022: 7222023: 2232024: 18242025: 35252026: 8626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

57 papers here report 612 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 23%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use complexity experts with complexity-biased routingAIO-3 average · PSNR32.30 -> 32.57HelpedComplexity Experts are Task-Discriminative Learners for Any Image Restoration (CVPR 2025 · 51 citations)
Average expert outputs uniformly instead of learning combine weightsJFT-4B · precision-at-154.3% -> 53.6%HurtFrom Sparse to Soft Mixtures of Experts (ICLR 2024 · 25 citations)
Replace parallel FFN experts with FME and add UaRAll-Weather average · PSNR28.95 -> 29.01HelpedEfficient Deweahter Mixture-of-Experts with Uncertainty-Aware Feature-Wise Linear Modulation (AAAI 2024 · 18 citations)
add expert buffering to dynamic gatingMT decoder, single-node · throughputHurtToward Efficient Inference for Mixture of Experts (NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations)
Increase expert count from 2 to 4 or 8 in MoDETabular benchmark datasets · accuracyMoDE accuracy is higher with 8 experts than 2 experts on all seven datasetsHelpedMoDE: A Mixture-of-Experts Model with Mutual Distillation among the Experts (AAAI 2024 · 14 citations)
use 6 heads instead of 4English-focused language modeling · perplexity12.72 -> 12.41HelpedMulti-Head Mixture-of-Experts (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
freeze the expert-shared base FFNCode generation · Overall61.0 -> 59.7HurtDeRS: Towards Extremely Efficient Upcycled Mixture-of-Experts Models (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
Increase granularity above G=1C4 language modeling · lossHelpedScaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Experts (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
add checkpoint recycling to Soft MoECIFAR-100 · accuracy75.9 -> 84.7HelpedMoE Jetpack: From Dense Checkpoints to Adaptive Mixture of Experts for Vision Tasks (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
use Pos-3 instead of Pos-2 shortcut position8×A30-PCIe · training speedup1.43× -> 1.49×HelpedShortcut-connected Expert Parallelism for Accelerating Mixture of Experts (ICML 2025 · 2 citations)
add load-balancing refinement to the L1 regularizationDownstream tasks, load balancing ablation · Avg. accuracy39.52 -> 40.03HelpedReMoE: Fully Differentiable Mixture-of-Experts with ReLU Routing (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)
add a larger MLP router instead of a linear routerEnwiki8 test · BPC1.128 -> 1.137HurtLayerwise Recurrent Router for Mixture-of-Experts (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
MoE-LLaVAMMEscore1318 – 14312 papers, e.g. ICLR 2025 and ICLR 2025

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 48 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • WikiText-103 · 7 of 48 papers
  • FineWeb-Edu · 4 of 48 papers
  • WikiText-2 · 3 of 48 papers
  • C4 · 3 of 48 papers
  • Winogrande · 3 of 48 papers
  • MMLU · 3 of 48 papers
  • LLaVA-mix-665k · 2 of 48 papers
  • RedPajama-v2 · 2 of 48 papers

Baselines

  • MC-SMoE · 3 of 48 papers
  • Switch Transformer · 3 of 48 papers
  • LLaVA-1.5 · 3 of 48 papers
  • DeepSpeed-MoE · 2 of 48 papers
  • M-SMoE · 2 of 48 papers
  • Loss-Free Balancing · 2 of 48 papers
  • NAEE · 2 of 48 papers
  • XMoE · 2 of 48 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 141 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 30 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy