atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / OOD and anomaly detection

Mining In-distribution Attributes in Outliers for Out-of-distribution Detection

AAAI 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › OOD and anomaly detection · approach: Provable and feature-based OOD detection · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MVOL, an outlier-exposure OOD detection framework that mines in-distribution attributes in auxiliary outliers via an extended multi-view data model, using MaxLogit scoring and a soft-label multi-view learning objective.

Problem

Outlier-exposure OOD detection methods suppress logits on auxiliary outliers uniformly, ignoring that outliers often contain in-distribution attributes, which can degrade detection and waste useful signal.

Approach

Extends the multi-view data model so outliers consist of minor ID features plus noise; justifies MaxLogit as an interpretable and effective OOD score; and replaces the uniform confidence loss with a soft-label objective that adaptively aligns logits of categories with minor ID features rather than suppressing them blindly.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MVOL instead of OE + MaxLogitWide ResNet-40-2, single model · CIFAR-10 OODFPR95: 4.12{ \ $\pm$ 0.20} -> 3.30{ \ $\pm$ 0.19}Helped
Use MVOL instead of OE + MaxLogitWide ResNet-40-2, single model · CIFAR-100 OODFPR95: 46.20{ \ $\pm$ 3.53} -> 42.96{ \ $\pm$ 0.86}Helped
Use MVOL instead of OE + MaxLogitWide ResNet-40-2, ensemble distillation · CIFAR-10 OODAUROC: 98.62{ \ $\pm$ 0.06} -> 98.61{ \ $\pm$ 0.06}No clear effect
Use MVOL instead of OE + MaxLogitWide ResNet-40-2, ensemble distillation · CIFAR-100 OODFPR95: 46.92{ \ $\pm$ 0.75} -> 36.62{ \ $\pm$ 1.36}Helped
Use MVOL instead of OE + MaxLogitWide ResNet-40-2, ensemble distillation · CIFAR-100 OODAUROC: 90.79{ \ $\pm$ 0.26} -> 90.37{ \ $\pm$ 0.43}Hurt
Use MVOL instead of OE + MaxLogitWide ResNet-40-2, single model · Wild dataset, α=0.5FPR95: 45.14{ \ $\pm$ 2.94} -> 25.53{ \ $\pm$ 1.23}Helped
Use MVOL instead of OE + MaxLogitWide ResNet-40-2, ensemble distillation · Wild dataset, α=0.5FPR95: 54.23{ \ $\pm$ 3.77} -> 14.85{ \ $\pm$ 1.86}Helped
Use ensemble distillation instead of single-model trainingMVOL · CIFAR-100 OODFPR95: 42.96{ \ $\pm$ 0.86} -> 36.62{ \ $\pm$ 1.36}Helped
Use ensemble distillation instead of single-model trainingMVOL · CIFAR-10 OODFPR95No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 300K RandomImages SVHN Textures Places365 LSUN (crop) LSUN (resize) iSUN

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 OOD detection CIFAR-100 OOD detection wild-dataset OOD detection (CIFAR-10 with CIFAR-100 auxiliary, noise alpha 0-0.5)

Metrics: FPR95 AUROC ID-Acc

Baselines: MSP Energy MaxLogit ODIN Mahalanobis KNN ASH VOS ATOL Energy w/Aux OE OE + MaxLogit

Builds on: Multi-view data model (Allen-Zhu & Li) Outlier Exposure MaxLogit Energy-based OOD detection WOODS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy