atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Human and embodied modeling

McHirc: A Multimodal Benchmark for Chinese Idiom Reading Comprehension

AAAI 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Human and embodied modeling · approach: Multimodal retrieval-augmented modeling · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Builds MChIRC, a 44,433 image-text pair benchmark for multimodal Chinese idiom cloze, and proposes DCIGN, a dual-contrastive graph network that reaches 73.00% average accuracy.

Problem

Chinese idiom reading comprehension (cloze selection among seven candidate idioms) has been studied only with text, although idioms often appear with images in real scenarios with short contexts.

Approach

Combines coarse and fine dual-contrastive text-image alignment, a GCN over candidate idiom embeddings, and cross-attention fusion to select the idiom, on a new multimodal idiom dataset with short sentences.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add GCN for candidate-idiom graph modeling (ablation)DCIGN · MChIRC Avgaccuracy: 51.47 -> 73.00Helped
Add coarse contrastive learning loss (Lccl) (ablation)DCIGN · MChIRC Avgaccuracy: 34.07 -> 73.00Helped
Add fine contrastive learning loss (Lfcl) (ablation)DCIGN · MChIRC Avgaccuracy: 65.93 -> 73.00Helped
Add text self-attention (TSA) (ablation)DCIGN · MChIRC Avgaccuracy: 63.81 -> 73.00Helped
Add vision self-attention (VSA) (ablation)DCIGN · MChIRC Avgaccuracy: 64.09 -> 73.00Helped
Add coarse and fine contrastive learning losses together (ablation)DCIGN · MChIRC Avgaccuracy: 34.16 -> 73.00Helped
Add text and vision self-attention together (ablation)DCIGN · MChIRC Avgaccuracy: 34.46 -> 73.00Helped
Change the coarse/fine contrastive-loss weights (α, β) across the reported settings (ablation)DCIGN · MChIRC Avgaccuracy: 71.27; 72.61; 70.55; 73.00; 70.79; 72.12; 70.78; 70.71; 72.86Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MChIRC ChID

Benchmarks: MChIRC

Metrics: accuracy Avg-Acc

Baselines: BERT-WWM RoBERTa MacBERT PRIEM RISCF MSCLM VGG-16 CLIP DeiT MSCA Multi-view CLIP DivE

Builds on: BERT DeiT ChID MSCLM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy