atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

Understanding Task Transfer in Vision-Language Models

CVPR 2026 · Vision-language and multimodal › Multimodal LLMs · approach: VLM capability analysis · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Studies zero-shot cross-task transfer in VLMs by LoRA-finetuning Qwen-2.5-VL (3B/7B/32B) on each of 13 BLINK perception tasks and measuring effects on other tasks with the Perfection Gap Factor metric.

Problem

Finetuning a VLM on one visual perception task can unpredictably change its zero-shot performance on other perception tasks, and existing accuracy-gain metrics ignore differences in task difficulty and ceilings.

Approach

Introduces the Perfection Gap Factor (PGF), the ratio of accuracy gain to remaining gap to a ceiling, and builds on it breadth-and-magnitude-aware transferability and malleability scores, a task transfer graph, cliques, and task personas (donors, pirates, sponges, sieves).

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: BLINK DreamSim (Nights) TallyQA Depth in the Wild TARA WikiArt FunKPoint SPair-71k Visual Spatial Reasoning LVIS HPatches Wild 6D

Benchmarks: BLINK VSI-Bench

Metrics: Perfection Gap Factor transferability malleability accuracy

Baselines: GPT-4o GPT-4V LLaVA-1.5-13B

Builds on: LoRA QLoRA Taskonomy

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy