atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

Will Multimodal Models Be Dazzled by Multi-Image Visual Puzzles?

CVPR 2026 · Vision-language and multimodal › Multimodal LLMs · approach: Chain-of-thought multimodal reasoning

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces MIRACLE, a 4,000-question benchmark of multi-image (2-14 images) visual reasoning puzzles and subject questions, and evaluates leading proprietary and open-source MLLMs, finding that even Gemini-2.5-Pro reaches only 55.91%.

Problem

Existing multi-image benchmarks use few images and shallow inter-image relations, so they do not adequately test complex cross-image reasoning in MLLMs.

Approach

A benchmark of cross-image reasoning tasks (puzzles, games, sorting/jigsaw, subject questions) with 2-14 images per question, a fine-grained taxonomy of 15 subtasks, and a partial-credit adjacency-based scoring rule for sorting tasks.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MIRACLE

Benchmarks: MIRACLE

Metrics: accuracy adjacency-based partial score for sorting tasks

Baselines: GPT-4o GPT-4.1 OpenAI o3 OpenAI o4-mini Claude-3.7V-Sonnet Claude-4-Sonnet Seed-1.6 Seed-1.6-Thinking InternVL2.5-MPO InternVL3 Ovis2 QVQ-72B-Preview

Builds on: VLMEvalKit MMMU

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy