atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

Learn How to Query from Unlabeled Data Streams in Federated Learning

AAAI 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Personalized and heterogeneous FL · approach: Federated learning with pretrained models · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes LeaDQ, a QMIX-based multi-agent RL method that learns decentralized client-side data query policies for streaming unlabeled data in federated learning, guided by global model state and reward.

Problem

Selecting which streaming unlabeled samples to annotate on decentralized clients in federated learning, where local selection ignores the global training objective and data cannot be shared.

Approach

Frames federated data querying as a Dec-POMDP solved with QMIX under centralized training and decentralized execution: each client has a local Q-network over its arriving samples, mixed into a joint Q-value conditioned on a global state (confidence of the global model on a server held-out set), with reward equal to held-out accuracy gain.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use LeaDQ instead of the strongest listed baselineFederated querying on SVHN · SVHN, tested Nq/Nu ratiosaccuracy (%)Helped
use LeaDQ instead of the strongest listed baselineFederated querying under distribution-based skew · SVHN, α=0.1, α=0.5, and α=1.0accuracy (%)Helped
use LeaDQ instead of the strongest listed baselineFederated querying under quantity skew · SVHN, C=2, C=3, and C=4accuracy (%)Helped
use LeaDQ instead of the strongest listed baselineFederated querying · Tiny-ImageNet, α=0.5 and α=0.1accuracy (%)Helped
use LeaDQ instead of the strongest listed baselineFederated querying with 50 clients · SVHNaccuracy (%)Helped
vary episode length J across 5, 20, and 30 (ablation)LeaDQ · SVHNaccuracy: 61.00% ; 59.79% ; 59.79%No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SVHN CIFAR-100 20Newsgroup MNIST Tiny-ImageNet

Benchmarks: SVHN CIFAR-100 20Newsgroup Tiny-ImageNet

Metrics: model accuracy KL distribution divergence

Baselines: Uncertainty Coreset LoGo KAFAL

Builds on: QMIX FedAvg Dec-POMDP LoGo KAFAL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy