atlas

Research map / Large language models / Reasoning and chain of thought

Boule or Baguette? A Study on Task Topology, Length Generalization, and the Benefit of Reasoning Trace

NeurIPS 2026 · Large language models › Reasoning and chain of thought · approach: Efficient and adaptive thinking

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces PITA, a 23M-statement Lean-formalized propositional logic dataset, and a transitive inference toy task, showing reasoning-trace models generalize better on broad/shallow splits but worse on narrow/deep splits than direct-prediction models.

Problem

Understanding how reasoning traces support reasoning and where they fail, specifically length generalization as a function of task depth and breadth.

Approach

Defines task depth (number of unique proof states) and breadth (number of unique statements per size) as topology measures; compares RT (proof-trained) vs direct prediction models on PITA splits and a minimal transitive inference task with a max-margin theoretical analysis.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PITA

Benchmarks: PITA splits (Full, Imply, Or, PHP) transitive inference task

Metrics: generalization accuracy

Baselines: direct prediction models

Builds on: chain-of-thought prompting QLoRA focused proof search muP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy