atlas

Research map / Video / Video-language understanding

Hierarchical Multi-Source Uncertainty Aggregation for Interactive Video Captioning

AAAI 2025 · Video › Video-language understanding · approach: Encoder-decoder video captioning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes hierarchical multi-source uncertainty aggregation (syntax, concept, alignment) built on conditional vacuity from evidential learning to select informative videos for active video captioning.

Problem

Entropy-based uncertainty for generative video captioning is inflated and ignores the diversity of valid captions, which misleads active sample selection for annotation in specialized domains.

Approach

Extends evidential-learning vacuity to a word-level conditional vacuity, then hierarchically aggregates it over words (syntax), sampled tags (concept), and CLIP-based video-caption alignment into a holistic uncertainty used to rank unlabeled videos for annotation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use hierarchical multi-source uncertainty aggregationProposed video captioning framework · UCFCAPROUGE: 0.342 -> 0.359Helped
Use hierarchical multi-source uncertainty aggregationProposed video captioning framework · MSRVTTROUGE: 0.470 -> 0.493Helped
Add syntax-level uncertainty rather than using negative likelihood (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · UCFCAPROUGE: 0.354 -> 0.359Helped
Add syntax-level uncertainty rather than using negative likelihood (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · MSRVTTROUGE: 0.462 -> 0.493Helped
Add aggregation over tags (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · UCFCAPROUGE: 0.349 -> 0.359Helped
Add aggregation over tags (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · MSRVTTROUGE: 0.454 -> 0.493Helped
Add alignment between visual and text embeddings (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · UCFCAPROUGE: 0.340 -> 0.359Helped
Add alignment between visual and text embeddings (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · MSRVTTROUGE: 0.451 -> 0.493Helped
Use the proposed decoding strategy instead of greedy decoding (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · UCFCAPROUGE: 0.350 -> 0.359Helped
Use the proposed decoding strategy instead of greedy decoding (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · MSRVTTROUGE: 0.464 -> 0.493Helped
Use the proposed decoding strategy instead of beam search (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · UCFCAPROUGE: 0.352 -> 0.359Helped
Use the proposed decoding strategy instead of beam search (ablation)Proposed video captioning framework · MSRVTTROUGE: 0.485 -> 0.493Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: UCFCAP MSR-VTT

Benchmarks: UCFCAP MSR-VTT

Metrics: BLEU-4 ROUGE CIDEr

Baselines: JLL SE CRE MSSE

Builds on: evidential learning Perceiver resampler CLIP GPT-2

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy