atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

HeterGP: Bridging Heterogeneity in Graph Neural Networks with Multi-View Prompting

AAAI 2025 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Graph structure learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes HeterGP, a graph prompt-tuning framework that uses random-walk-based BFS/DFS subgraphs and two prompt graphs (homophilic and heterophilic views) to adapt frozen pre-trained GNNs to node and graph classification in few-shot settings.

Problem

Existing graph prompt-tuning methods assume graph homophily in both pre-training and prompt design, so they perform poorly on highly heterophilic graphs for few-shot multi-task node and graph classification.

Approach

Use Node2Vec-style random walks with BFS-like (homophilic) and DFS-like (heterophilic) biases to build two subgraph views, attach a separately structured prompt graph to each view (similarity-threshold links for homophily vs. dissimilarity-threshold links for heterophily), encode both with a frozen pre-trained GNN, and fuse the representations with an attention-based classifier.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use HeterGP's multi-view prompting instead of the compared methodsGraph classification models · ENZYMES, 5-shotaccuracyHelped
Use HeterGP's multi-view prompting instead of the compared methodsNode classification models · heterophilic datasets, few-shot settingsaccuracyHelped
Add the homophilic-view prompt (ablation)HeterGP · CiteSeer and Texas, 10-shotaccuracyMixed
Add the heterophilic-view prompt (ablation)HeterGP · CiteSeer and Texas, 10-shotaccuracyMixed
Add both homophilic- and heterophilic-view prompts (ablation)HeterGP · PROTEINS, 10-shotaccuracyHelped
Train the multi-view prompt tokens instead of using random, non-trainable tokens (ablation)HeterGP · CiteSeer, Texas, and PROTEINS, 10-shotaccuracyHelped
Use random-walk subgraph extraction instead of K-hop subgraphs (ablation)HeterGP · node classification and graph classificationaccuracyHelped
Increase the number of prompt tokensHeterGP · Texas, Actor, and ENZYMESaccuracyNo clear effect
Increase the number of few-shot samplesHeterGP · node classificationaccuracyHelped
Increase the number of few-shot samplesHeterGP · graph classificationaccuracyHurt
Use HeterGP with a GCN pre-trained backboneGraphCL pre-training plus prompting · CiteSeer, Texas, and Actor, 5-shotaccuracyHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cora CiteSeer PubMed Texas Wisconsin Cornell Actor Chameleon Squirrel ENZYMES PROTEINS MUTAG

Benchmarks: Cora CiteSeer PubMed Texas Wisconsin Cornell Actor Chameleon Squirrel ENZYMES PROTEINS MUTAG

Metrics: accuracy (mean ± std)

Baselines: GCN GAT GT GraphCL+FT simGRACE+FT GraphPrompt All-in-One

Builds on: All-in-One GraphPrompt GPPT RAWGNN Node2Vec

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy