Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling
Free energy Estimation on Any State Space
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Generalizes escorted Jarzynski equality and Crooks fluctuation theorem from continuous Langevin transports to arbitrary Markov processes and state spaces, learns forward-backward neural transports (FEAT-style), and reveals a generalized dihedral group structure of infinitesimal reversals and Doob h-transforms.
Problem
Free energy (log normalizing constant) estimation via finite-time nonequilibrium transports suffers high variance; existing learned escort methods are limited to continuous state spaces with SDE transports.
Approach
Derives generalized escorted Jarzynski and Crooks identities for any Markov generator on arbitrary state spaces, with a work functional including an escort term defined via the adjoint generator, and learns forward/backward transports via generator matching or marginal score/concrete score to minimize dissipation; a BAR-style combined estimator is used.
Key results
- CTMC-FEAT on Ising models of size up to 32x32 (1024 spins) gives free energy estimates within roughly 0.1-1 x10^-3 per dimension of reference values across DFM, GM-no mask and GM-w. mask variants.
- AR-FEAT on Ising models at beta=0.2, 0.4, 0.6 matches reference free energies to about 0.01 x10^-3 per dimension for 15x15 to 32x32 lattices.
- Momentum-augmented transport is reported as comparable to standard SDE transport on 40D Gaussian mixtures and slightly more robust to larger noise.
Surprising findings
- Autoregressive transport achieves very strong performance, attributed to the strong learning signal of AR training.
- Masked generator matching is slightly less robust than no-mask choices in discrete settings, and at larger beta gap the discrepancy grows.
Limitations
- Expressiveness limited by network parameterization and may need domain-specific tuning
- Heavy-tailed targets (e.g., Cauchy) pose difficulties for finite-time transport models
Experimental setup
Datasets: Ising model samples Ising fluid 40-dimensional Gaussian mixtures
Benchmarks: Ising models (discrete) Ising fluid (multimodal) 40D Gaussian mixture (momentum transport)
Metrics: free energy difference estimates vs reference forward-backward estimator gap standard deviation across estimator runs
Baselines: DFM FEAT MBAR
Builds on: escorted Jarzynski estimator FEAT generator matching discrete flow matching Bennett acceptance ratio
Closest papers by meaning
- FEAT: Free energy Estimators with Adaptive Transport (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.91)
- Learning Physics Informed Neural ODEs with Partial Measurements (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.87)
- Energy-guided Entropic Neural Optimal Transport (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.86)
- Predicting the Energy Landscape of Stochastic Dynamical System via Physics-informed Self-supervised Learning (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.85)
- Expectile Regularization for Fast and Accurate Training of Neural Optimal Transport (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.84)
- Learning the Infinitesimal Generator of Stochastic Diffusion Processes (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.84)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
