atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

FedMSGL: A Self-Expressive Hypergraph Based Federated Multi-View Learning

AAAI 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Personalized and heterogeneous FL · approach: Federated semi-supervised and graph learning · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FedMSGL, a vertical federated multi-view clustering method that uses self-expressive subspace learning to get uniform-dimension subspaces locally and builds a global hypergraph from consistent and view-specific subspaces at the server.

Problem

Vertical federated learning overlooks differences in feature dimensions across participants (biasing global models toward high-dimensional nodes) and does not handle multi-view data well, so federated multi-view clustering remains underexplored.

Approach

Local nodes learn self-expressive subspace embeddings of equal dimension (n x n), split into consistent and view-specific parts with a manifold coefficient matrix; the server fuses consistent parts with adaptive inverse-distance weights and builds a global k-NN hypergraph from the global and view-specific affinities to get the clustering indicator via spectral decomposition.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FedMSGL instead of FedMVLfederated multi-view clustering · SonarACC: 0.6250±0.00 -> 0.6466±0.00Helped
Use FedMSGL instead of FSMSCmulti-view clustering · BBC SportACC: 0.8272±0.00 -> 0.9022±0.04Helped
Use FedMSGL instead of FSMSCmulti-view clustering · ORLACC: 0.8025±0.00 -> 0.8283±0.02Helped
Use FedMSGL instead of FSMSCmulti-view clustering · HandwrittenACC: 0.8845±0.00 -> 0.8898±0.08Helped
Use FedMSGL instead of CDMGCmulti-view clustering · Caltech101-7ACC: 0.7631±0.05 -> 0.7256±0.07Hurt
Use FedMSGL instead of SFMCmulti-view clustering · SonarPurity: 0.6826±0.00 -> 0.6466±0.00Hurt
Use FedMSGL instead of FSMSCmulti-view clustering · BBC SportPurity: 0.8327±0.00 -> 0.9061±0.02Helped
Use FedMSGL instead of CDMGCmulti-view clustering · ORLPurity: 0.8600±0.01 -> 0.8520±0.01Hurt
Use FedMSGL instead of FSMSCmulti-view clustering · HandwrittenPurity: 0.8845±0.00 -> 0.8964±0.08Helped
Use FedMSGL instead of CDMGCmulti-view clustering · Caltech101-7Purity: 0.8937±0.09 -> 0.8453±0.01Hurt
Use FedMSGL instead of FedMVLfederated multi-view clustering · SonarNMI: 0.1398±0.00 -> 0.1204±0.00Hurt
Use FedMSGL instead of FSMSCmulti-view clustering · BBC SportNMI: 0.7217±0.00 -> 0.7543±0.03Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Sonar BBC Sport ORL Handwritten Caltech101-7

Benchmarks: Sonar BBC Sport ORL Handwritten Caltech101-7

Metrics: ACC Purity NMI

Baselines: SC SFMC CDMGC FSMSC RCAGL FedMVL FedMVFCM FedMVFPC

Builds on: self-expressive subspace learning hypergraph Laplacian FedBCD FedV

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy