atlas

Research map / Large language models / AI and society

Watermarking Without Standards Is Not AI Governance

NeurIPS 2026 · Large language models › AI and society · approach: Human-centered trust and agency · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Position paper arguing that AI watermarking without enforceable technical standards, independent audits, and regulatory enforcement becomes symbolic compliance, supported by a small SynthID-Text and AudioSeal robustness check and a three-layer framework.

Problem

Watermarking is cited in AI governance frameworks (EU AI Act, US EO 14110, California SB 942, China's Deep Synthesis Provisions) but current schemes are brittle, hard to audit, proprietary, and lack defined robustness thresholds, so they may provide only symbolic compliance.

Approach

Reframes watermarking as a governance problem and proposes a three-layer framework (technical requirements with shared low-FPR benchmarks, black-box third-party audit infrastructure, and policy enforcement with certification and penalties) to make watermark claims verifiable.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Benchmarks: SynthID-Text detection on 5 Gemma-2-9b-it outputs AudioSeal detection on 5 AudioGen clips

Metrics: watermark detection score vs. threshold

Baselines: SynthID-Text AudioSeal

Builds on: SynthID-Text AudioSeal MarkLLM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy