atlas

Research map / Large language models / AI and society

Participatory ML for Social Harm Should be Constructed, Validated and Reasoned Through First-Person Accounts

NeurIPS 2026 · Large language models › AI and society · approach: Data commons and human baselines

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's abstract only. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Position paper arguing that participatory machine learning for social harm evaluation should use community first-person accounts as the raw signal for constructing, validating, and reasoning about harm resources.

Problem

Participatory ML has broadened who builds social harm evaluation resources, but the kind of text used as raw signal is largely unexamined; researcher-generated stimuli fix the harm frame before community participation and structured annotation filters out interpretive harm knowledge.

Approach

Argues that first-person accounts written by affected community members should serve as the primary raw signal for constructing, validating, and reasoning through social harm evaluation resources, rather than researcher-generated stimuli.

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy