atlas

Research map / Large language models / Reasoning and chain of thought

Operads for compositional reasoning in LLMs

NeurIPS 2026 · Large language models › Reasoning and chain of thought · approach: Efficient and adaptive thinking · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes modeling LLM question decomposition with operads, defining a questions operad and an operadic consistency diagnostic, with empirical evaluation deferred to a companion paper.

Problem

Question decomposition, used to improve LLM reasoning, lacks a rigorous mathematical foundation, and there is no principled way to define correctness or error propagation for decompositions without ground-truth labels.

Approach

Model question decomposition as the questions operad, in which operations are question templates with blanks and composition is substitution of sub-answers; interpret QA models as algebras over it and define operadic consistency as agreement of answers across partial collapses of a question decomposition tree.

Key results

Limitations

Experimental setup

Builds on: chain-of-thought prompting decomposed prompting uncertainty of thoughts May's operad theory

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy