atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / RL from feedback

Truncate Bad, Upweight Good: BoN-Style Distillation via Rank-Based Classification

NeurIPS 2026 · Reinforcement learning › RL from feedback · approach: Reward modeling versus direct optimization · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes TUP, an offline BoN-distillation policy that truncates low-win-rate completions and softly reweights the retained upper tail, trained via BCE with shifted-truncated win-rates as soft labels.

Problem

Rank-based BoN distillation policies use smooth full-support reweighting, leaving low-ranked completions in the support, while sharper reweighting over-relies on brittle top-rank distinctions from a single reward model.

Approach

Decouple lower-tail truncation (threshold lambda on win-rate, zero mass below) from upper-tail sharpness (beta); the target has a closed-form prompt-independent normalizer (incomplete Beta), enabling offline BCE training with shifted-truncated win-rates as soft labels and log-likelihood ratios as logits.</type_placeholder>

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: UltraFeedback Magpie Air

Benchmarks: UltraFeedback eval split Magpie Air eval split AlpacaEval

Metrics: LC reward raw reward LC win rate win rate length

Baselines: DPO REBEL QRPO BoNBoN

Builds on: QRPO BoNBoN DPO REBEL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy