atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

MMR-V: What's Left Unsaid? A Benchmark for Multimodal Deep Reasoning in Videos

ICLR 2026 · Vision-language and multimodal › Multimodal LLMs · approach: Chain-of-thought multimodal reasoning

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces MMR-V, a manually annotated benchmark of 317 videos and 1,257 multiple-choice tasks testing long-range multi-frame multimodal reasoning beyond perception, and shows top models reach only 64.3%.

Problem

Existing video benchmarks mostly test perception and understanding over question-adjacent frames, not deep multimodal reasoning that requires locating and analyzing long-range evidence frames.

Approach

A video reasoning benchmark with fully human-annotated questions, implicit vs. explicit reasoning taxonomy (10 task categories, 33 subcategories), and model-aligned distractors generated by GPT-4o or written by humans, plus analyses of CoT and test-time scaling.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Benchmarks: MMR-V

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: GPT-4o Gemini-2.5-Pro GPT-5 o3 Gemini-2.0-Flash Qwen2.5-VL-72B Gemma-3-27b-it InternVL2.5-38B

Builds on: Kahneman dual process theory chain-of-thought prompting

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy