atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs?

AAAI 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: RNN training dynamics and gradients · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Tests whether three transformer interpretability methods (contrastive activation addition, tuned lens, and quirky-model latent knowledge elicitation) transfer to RNNs such as Mamba and RWKV, and proposes state steering using the RNN's compressed state.

Problem

Whether interpretability methods designed for transformer language models (steering, latent prediction elicitation, latent knowledge elicitation) still work on modern RNN architectures like Mamba and RWKV.

Approach

Applies contrastive activation addition, tuned lens, and quirky-model probing unchanged to Mamba and RWKV, and introduces state steering, which computes steering vectors from the RNN's recurrent state rather than the residual stream.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply contrastive activation addition to RNN residual streamsMamba 2.8b-slimpj and RWKV-v5 7b · Seven alignment-relevant behaviorsbehavior probability change: 0.15; 0.2Mixed
Use activation steering on RNNs instead of comparable transformersMamba 2.8b-slimpj and RWKV-v5 7b · Sycophancy and refusal steeringbehavior probability changeHurt
Steer with both the RNN residual stream and internal stateMamba and RWKV-v5 · Alignment-relevant behaviorsbehavior probability changeMixed
Add state steering to activation steeringMamba and RWKV-v5 · Alignment-relevant behaviorsbehavior probability changeNo clear effect
Use the tuned lens instead of the logit lensMamba and RWKV-v4 · Pile validation setperplexityHelped
Increase tuned-lens layer depthMamba and RWKV-v4 · Pile validation setperplexityHelped
Use tied embedding and unembedding matricesMamba tuned lens · Early layersperplexityHurt
Train probes on Alice easy contexts and transfer them to Bob hard contextsMamba 2.8b-slimpj · Quirky-model binary classification tasksprobe AUROC: 0.76; 0.78; 0.72; 0.76; 0.71; 0.71Helped
Train unsupervised probes on all context combinations instead of Alice easy contexts (ablation)Mamba 2.8b-slimpj · Bob hard contextsprobe AUROC: 0.71 -> 0.54; 0.71 -> 0.69Hurt
Train probes on Alice easy contexts and transfer them to Bob hard contextsBTLM-3b-8k · Quirky-model binary classification tasksprobe AUROC: 0.69; 0.75; 0.66; 0.52; 0.70; 0.68Helped
Train unsupervised probes on all context combinations instead of Alice easy contexts (ablation)BTLM-3b-8k · Bob hard contextsprobe AUROC: 0.70 -> 0.54; 0.68 -> 0.66Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: OpenHermes 2.5 The Pile Rimsky et al. (2023) behavior dataset Mallen and Belrose quirky datasets

Benchmarks: Rimsky et al. behavior steering dataset Pile validation (perplexity) quirky model probing (Alice/Bob)

Metrics: change in behavior probability under steering perplexity / bits per byte AUROC

Baselines: Llama-2-7b-chat BTLM-3b-8k Logit lens BTLM probes

Builds on: Contrastive activation addition Tuned lens Quirky models (Mallen and Belrose 2023) LoRA

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy