atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Shape and surface completion

Digging into Intrinsic Contextual Information for High-fidelity 3D Point Cloud Completion

AAAI 2025 · Point clouds › Shape and surface completion · approach: Point cloud completion networks · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a two-stage point cloud completion method with a diffusion-based coarse generator and a Context-aware Refiner that uses mixed sampling, surface freezing, and rigid-transformation-invariant similarity modeling to exploit short- and long-range contextual information from the partial input.

Problem

High-fidelity texture recovery in the fine stage of point cloud completion, which is ill-posed, given occlusion-induced incompleteness of partial point clouds.

Approach

Refines a diffusion-generated coarse point cloud using contextual information from the partial input: short-range via mixed sampling with surface freezing, and long-range via learned rotation and symmetry-plane alignment that yields rigid-transformation-invariant patch similarity for non-local refinement.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add mixed sampling (ablation)CRef · ShapeNet-ViPC (ablation slice)L2 Chamfer Distance × 10^-3 (Avg.): 2.96 -> 2.21Helped
add surface freezing (ablation)CRef · ShapeNet-ViPC (ablation slice)L2 Chamfer Distance × 10^-3 (Avg.): 2.74 -> 2.21Helped
add rigid transformation (ablation)CRef · ShapeNet-ViPC (ablation slice)L2 Chamfer Distance × 10^-3 (Avg.): 2.43 -> 2.21Helped
replace the full similarity modeling with Euclidean similarity only (ablation)CRef · ShapeNet-ViPC (ablation slice)L2 Chamfer Distance × 10^-3 (Avg.): 2.21 -> 2.24Hurt
use the feature similarity variant instead of the full similarity modeling (ablation)CRef · ShapeNet-ViPC (ablation slice)L2 Chamfer Distance × 10^-3 (Avg.): 2.21 -> 2.22Hurt
use the proposed method instead of CSDNShapeNet-ViPC · ShapeNet-ViPCL2 CD × 10^-3 (Avg.): 2.570 -> 2.148Helped
use the proposed method instead of ShapeFormerPartNet · PartNetMMD × 10^-3 (Avg.): 1.32 -> 1.51Hurt
use the proposed method instead of PDRMVP · MVPEMD × 10^-2: 1.37 -> 2.22Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ShapeNet-ViPC PartNet 3D-EPN MVP

Benchmarks: ShapeNet-ViPC 3D-EPN PartNet MVP

Metrics: L2 Chamfer Distance F-Score EMD MMD UHD

Baselines: PCN TopNet GRNet PF-Net PoinTr ViPC SeedFormer CSDN PointAttN PDR cGAN Diverse

Builds on: DDPM PointTr DGCNN PDR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy