atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Shape and surface completion

DiffCorr: Conditional Diffusion Model with Reliable Pseudo-Label Guidance for Unsupervised Point Cloud Shape Correspondence

AAAI 2025 · Point clouds › Shape and surface completion · approach: Unsupervised shape correspondence · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DiffCorr, a conditional DDIM-style diffusion model with a transformer backbone and a reliable pseudo-label generator (optimal transport plus cycle-consistency) for unsupervised point cloud shape correspondence on human and animal datasets.

Problem

Unsupervised dense point cloud correspondence between non-rigid human and animal shapes fails under large-scale motion displacements when using one-step similarity-based matching, and no ground-truth labels guide refinement.

Approach

Replace one-step matching with coarse-to-fine multi-step denoising of flow residuals, conditioned on an initial flow from embedding similarity and a DGCNN-encoded local cost, with pseudo-flow supervision from Sinkhorn optimal transport filtered by cycle-consistent matching and variance-weighted denoising loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use DiffCorr instead of SE-ORNetpoint cloud shape correspondence · SURREAL/SHREC’19accuracy: 21.5% -> 22.53±0.27%Helped
use DiffCorr instead of SE-ORNetpoint cloud shape correspondence · SURREAL/SHREC’19err: 4.6 -> 4.31±0.08Helped
use DiffCorr instead of TANetpoint cloud shape correspondence · SHREC’19/SHREC’19accuracy: 21.5% -> 22.16±0.35%Helped
use DiffCorr instead of TANetpoint cloud shape correspondence · SHREC’19/SHREC’19err: 4.5 -> 4.36±0.07Helped
use DiffCorr instead of TANetpoint cloud shape correspondence · SMAL/TOSCAaccuracy: 37.1% -> 41.64 ± 0.56%Helped
use DiffCorr instead of TANetpoint cloud shape correspondence · SMAL/TOSCAerr: 3.7 -> 2.31± 0.12Helped
use DiffCorr instead of TANetpoint cloud shape correspondence · TOSCA/TOSCAaccuracy: 65.1% -> 66.71±1.79%Helped
use DiffCorr instead of TANetpoint cloud shape correspondence · TOSCA/TOSCAerr: 0.7 -> 0.65 ± 0.03Helped
add T-CDM, local cost, initial flow, optimal transport, and cross-consistent matching (ablation)DiffCorr · TOSCA/TOSCAaccuracy: 54.58% -> 66.71%Helped
add local cost, initial flow, and cross-consistent matching (ablation)DiffCorr with T-CDM and optimal transport · TOSCA/TOSCAaccuracy: 60.82% -> 66.71%Helped
add local cost, initial flow, and optimal transport (ablation)DiffCorr with T-CDM and cross-consistent matching · TOSCA/TOSCAaccuracy: 60.15% -> 66.71%Helped
add local cost and initial flow (ablation)DiffCorr with T-CDM, optimal transport, and cross-consistent matching · TOSCA/TOSCAaccuracy: 62.79% -> 66.71%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SURREAL SHREC'19 SMAL TOSCA

Benchmarks: SHREC'19 TOSCA SURREAL/SHREC'19 SMAL/TOSCA

Metrics: correspondence accuracy at 0.01 tolerance average correspondence error

Baselines: Diff-FMaps 3D-CODED Elementary CorrNet3D DPC HSTR SE-ORNet TANet

Builds on: DDIM DPC HSTR SE-ORNet adaLN-Zero

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy