Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs
PoSh: Using Scene Graphs to Guide LLMs-as-a-Judge for Detailed Image Descriptions
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Introduces PoSh, an open-weight reference-based metric that uses dependency-parsed, coreference-merged scene graphs as structured rubrics for a Qwen3-14B LLM judge, plus the DOCENT artwork description benchmark with granular and coarse human judgments.
Problem
Evaluating long, detailed image descriptions: standard metrics (CIDEr, SPICE) were built for short captions, cannot localize errors to text spans, and GPT-4o-as-a-judge is costly and not replicable.
Approach
Extract attribute- and relation-preserving scene graphs from generation and reference (dependency parsing plus coreference), then verify each component's presence in the other text via templated yes/no-style questions answered by an open LLM, yielding span-level granular scores aggregated into mistake, omission and overall coarse scores.
Key results
- PoSh achieves Spearman rho of 0.519 (mistakes), 0.581 (omissions) and 0.599 (overall quality) on DOCENT, beating the best replicable baseline and GPT-4o in all settings.
- On granular localization, PoSh reaches F1 0.580 for mistakes and 0.680 for omissions, the highest among compared methods.
- PoSh-tuned Qwen2.5-VL-7B via DAPO improves omissions (+0.432) and overall quality (+0.135) over SFT, at the cost of more mistakes (-0.243).
Surprising findings
- The Davidsonian Scene Graph metric performs near chance on DOCENT, with accuracies and correlations near zero.
- Even the best model, GPT-4o, covers only about 50.1% of reference visual information in DOCENT.
Limitations
- LLaVA-Critic (72B) outperforms PoSh on CapArena caption-level and model-level correlations, attributed partly to simple images.
- Coarse human agreement is moderate (Krippendorff alpha 0.409 to 0.509) and the granular judgments cover only 75 images.
- Reward-function experiment is small: 1,000 training images and only 40 pairs judged by graduate students.
Experimental setup
Datasets: DOCENT CapArena DCI DOCCI DetailCaps
Benchmarks: DOCENT CapArena
Metrics: pairwise accuracy Spearman rho Kendall tau macro F1
Baselines: BLEU-4 ROUGE-L METEOR CIDEr SPICE CAPTURE CLIPScore FLEUR Prometheus LLaVA-Critic DCScore Qwen3
Builds on: SPICE Davidsonian Scene Graph CAPTURE DCScore DAPO
Closest papers by meaning
- ContextRef: Evaluating Referenceless Metrics for Image Description Generation (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- VisMin: Visual Minimal-Change Understanding (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- Image2Struct: Benchmarking Structure Extraction for Vision-Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- Bridging Cognitive Gap: Hierarchical Description Learning for Artistic Image Aesthetics Assessment (AAAI 2026 · similarity 0.86)
- VisJudge-Bench: Aesthetics and Quality Assessment of Visualizations (ICLR 2026 · similarity 0.86)
- ConTextual: Evaluating Context-Sensitive Text-Rich Visual Reasoning in Large Multimodal Models (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.86)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
