atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Combinatorial and search optimization

Computationally Hard Problems Are Hard for QBF Proof Systems Too

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Combinatorial and search optimization · approach: SAT and model counting solvers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Transforms computationally hard problems from the polynomial hierarchy (Succinct k-Radius, k-Clique Colouring, ALL-EQUAL∃∀3SAT) into QBF families and proves unconditional exponential lower bounds for QU-Res and Q-Res via the cost technique.

Problem

Scarcity of natural, provably hard QBF formula families for analysing QBF proof systems (Q-Res, QU-Res) and testing solvers.

Approach

Encode PH-complete problems as QBFs and build families of "critical" structures that only just fail the property (many almost-k-centers, many 3-colour-selectable cliques, many non-monotonicity-enforceable assignments), then apply the semantic cost lower bound so that the QBFs need exponential-size QU-Res proofs unconditionally.

Key results

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: proof size lower bound (exponential) cost of QBF countermodels

Baselines: KBKF formulas equality formulas parity formulas CR formulas

Builds on: cost lower bound technique (Beyersdorff, Blinkhorn, Hinde 2019) Q-Resolution QU-Resolution

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy