atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

MolSpectra: Pre-training 3D Molecular Representation with Multi-modal Energy Spectra

ICLR 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Machine-learned interatomic potentials · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Pre-trains a 3D molecular encoder (TorchMD-Net) with denoising plus contrastive alignment to a multi-spectrum Transformer (SpecFormer) trained by masked patch reconstruction over UV-Vis, IR, and Raman spectra from QM9S.

Problem

Existing 3D molecular pre-training via denoising models only classical potential energy surfaces and ignores quantized energy level structure visible in experimental spectra, limiting the learned molecular representations.

Approach

Introduce multi-modal energy spectra into 3D pre-training: a single-stream Transformer (SpecFormer) encodes concatenated patches of UV-Vis, IR and Raman spectra with masked patch reconstruction, and an InfoNCE contrastive loss aligns its outputs with the 3D encoder so that only the 3D encoder is needed downstream.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add molecular spectra pre-training to CoordCoord · QM9MAE (homo, meV): 17.7 -> 15.5Helped
Add molecular spectra pre-training to CoordCoord · MD17MAE force: Aspirin: 0.211 -> 0.099; Naphthalene: 0.053 -> 0.085Mixed
Remove MPR loss (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (homo, meV): 15.5 -> 16.4Hurt
Remove MPR loss (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (lumo, meV): 13.1 -> 14.1Hurt
Remove MPR loss (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (gap, meV): 26.8 -> 29.7Hurt
Remove MPR and contrastive losses (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (homo, meV): 15.5 -> 17.5Hurt
Remove MPR and contrastive losses (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (lumo, meV): 13.1 -> 14.4Hurt
Remove MPR and contrastive losses (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (gap, meV): 26.8 -> 31.2Hurt
Remove UV-Vis spectrum (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (homo, meV): 15.5 -> 15.8Hurt
Remove IR spectrum (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (lumo, meV): 13.1 -> 14.1Hurt
Remove Raman spectrum (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (gap, meV): 26.8 -> 28.3Hurt
Use patch stride 10 instead of 5 (ablation)MolSpectra · QM9MAE (homo, meV): 15.9 -> 15.5Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PCQM4Mv2 QM9S QM9 MD17

Benchmarks: QM9 MD17

Metrics: MAE

Baselines: SchNet EGNN DimeNet++ PaiNN SphereNet TorchMD-Net Transformer-M SE(3)-DDM 3D-EMGP Coord SliDe

Builds on: Coordinate denoising (Coord) Fractional denoising (Frad) SliDe TorchMD-Net InfoNCE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy