atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

One Model Transfer to All: On Robust Jailbreak Prompts Generation against LLMs

ICLR 2025 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: LLM jailbreak and injection defense

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ArrAttack, a rewriting-based jailbreak framework that trains a robustness judgment model on SmoothLLM-defended outcomes and fine-tunes Llama2-7b generators to produce jailbreak prompts that survive defenses.

Problem

Existing jailbreak attacks ignore modern defenses (defensive suffixes, perturbation, paraphrasing, decoding defenses), so they lose effectiveness against defended LLMs.

Approach

Label rewriting-based jailbreak prompts by their robustness under SmoothLLM perturbation, train a universal robustness judgment model on these labels, and use the labeled robust prompts to fine-tune a Llama2-7b generator that produces robust jailbreak prompts in a single inference.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ArrAttack rather than ReNeLLMLlama2-7b-chat with six defenses · Average across six defensesASR (GPTFuzz, %): 21.34 -> 49.64Helped
Use ArrAttack rather than AutoDAN-HGAVicuna-7b with six defenses · Average across six defensesASR (GPTFuzz, %): 40.63 -> 51.69Helped
Use ArrAttack rather than AutoDAN-HGAGuanaco-7b with six defenses · Average across six defensesASR (GPTFuzz, %): 48.20 -> 71.76Helped
Transfer ArrAttack prompts instead of ReNeLLM promptsLlama2-7b-chat prompts transferred to Claude-3 · Claude-3ASR (%): 8.00 -> 40.00Helped
Add the robustness judgment model to BRJ (ablation)BRJ on plain Llama2-7b-chat · Without defensesASR (GPTFuzz, %): 89.79 -> 88.77Hurt
Add the generation model to BRJ (ablation)BRJ on plain Llama2-7b-chat · Without defensesASR (GPTFuzz, %): 89.79 -> 88.77Hurt
Add the robustness judgment model to BRJ (ablation)BRJ on defended models · 12 defense scenariosASR (GPTFuzz, %)Helped
Add the generation model to BRJ (ablation)BRJ on defended models · Defense conditionsASR (GPTFuzz, %)Helped
Add both the robustness judgment model and generation model to BRJ (ablation)ArrAttack across 12 defense scenarios · 12 defense scenariosAverage ASR (GPTFuzz, %): 31.33% to 58.58%; 86.97%Helped
Add both the robustness judgment model and generation model to BRJ (ablation)BRJ on plain LLMs · Llama2-7b-chat, Vicuna-7b, and Guanaco-7bASR (GPTFuzz, %): 89.79 -> 93.87; 100.00 -> 98.46; 99.48 -> 98.97Mixed
Add both the robustness judgment model and generation model to BRJ (ablation)BRJ prompt generation · Plain LLMsPPL: 93.34 -> 63.64; 79.80 -> 50.57; 83.24 -> 51.86Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: AdvBench HarmBench JBB-Behaviors

Benchmarks: AdvBench HarmBench JBB-Behaviors

Metrics: attack success rate semantic similarity perplexity

Baselines: AmpleGCG AutoDAN-GA AutoDAN-HGA ReNeLLM Prompt-only

Builds on: SmoothLLM GPTFuzz AutoDAN AmpleGCG ReNeLLM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy