atlas

Research map / Large language models / Instruction and fine-tuning

Multimodal Large Language Models for Inverse Molecular Design with Retrosynthetic Planning

ICLR 2025 · Large language models › Instruction and fine-tuning · approach: Calibration and knowledge in LLM tuning · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Llamole couples a base LLM with a frozen Graph Diffusion Transformer, a GNN reaction-template predictor, and A* retrosynthetic search to interleave text and molecular graph generation for inverse molecular design.

Problem

LLMs struggle to generate molecular structures that meet multi-property and synthesizability requirements because they handle graphs poorly when restricted to text representations such as SMILES, and they cannot plan multi-step retrosynthesis.

Approach

A multimodal LLM that uses trigger and query tokens to switch control to frozen graph modules (Graph DiT for molecule generation, GIN for reaction template prediction), interleaving text, molecules, and reactions, with the LLM also supplying heuristic cost estimates for A* retrosynthetic search.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use Llamole with graph-text multimodal generation instead of the strongest baselineMolecular design · Multi-conditional molecular designvalidity: 0.885 -> 0.913Helped
Use Llamole with graph-text multimodal generation instead of the strongest baselineMolecular design · Drug designBACE BA: 0.562 -> 0.746Helped
Use Llamole with graph-text multimodal generation instead of the strongest baselineMolecular design · Material designFFV MAE: 0.020 -> 0.021Hurt
Use Llamole instead of the strongest baselineMolecular design · Multi-conditional molecular designBLEU-4: 0.226 -> 0.262Helped
Use Llamole instead of the strongest baselineRetrosynthesis planning · Drug retrosynthesissuccess rate: 5.5 -> 35.1Helped
Use Llamole instead of the strongest baselineRetrosynthesis planning · Material retrosynthesissuccess rate: 4.8 -> 17.9Helped
Add text conditions to the Graph DiT input (ablation)Llamole Graph DiT · Controllable molecular generationchemical structure understandingHelped
Add property conditions to the Graph DiT input (ablation)Llamole Graph DiT · Controllable molecular generationproperty controllabilityHelped
Apply text-only SFT instead of ICLLlama-3-8B · Drug retrosynthesissuccess rate: 5.5% to below 1%Hurt
Remove the planning time constraintLlamole · Material retrosynthesissuccess rate: 0.176 -> 0.312; 0.143 -> 0.273; 0.179 -> 0.273Helped
Replace default LLM heuristics with domain heuristicsLlamole A* search · Material retrosynthesissuccess rate: 0.176 -> 0.176; 0.143 -> 0.147; 0.179 -> 0.181No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MolQA MolPair USPTO PubChem MoleculeNet ChEMBL ZINC PI1M Enamine building blocks

Benchmarks: MolQA

Metrics: validity similarity BLEU-4 ROUGE-L balanced accuracy mean absolute error retrosynthesis success rate

Baselines: GraphGA Llama-2-7B Mistral-7B Qwen2-7B Llama-3-8B Flan-T5-XXL Granite-13B Llama-2-13B Mistral-8x7B Llama-2-70B Llama-3-70B

Builds on: Graph DiT GraphGA CLIP LoRA A* search

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy