atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Learning local equivariant representations for quantum operators

ICLR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Scalable approximation and equivariant compute · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SLEM, a strictly local equivariant message-passing network with SO(2) convolution and invariant Slater-Koster overlap parameterization that predicts Hamiltonian, density, and overlap matrices in LCAO DFT with high accuracy and data efficiency.

Problem

Predicting DFT quantum operator matrices (Hamiltonian, density, overlap) for large systems is hindered by the growing receptive field of equivariant message-passing networks and the high cost of tensor products for high-order orbitals (f, g).

Approach

Strictly local node/edge updates that exclude neighbours of neighbours beyond the cutoff, SO(2) convolution to cut tensor-product cost from O(l^6) to O(l^3), and overlap predicted as invariant two-centre Slater-Koster scalars.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use SLEM instead of DeepH-E3 for Hamiltonian predictionMoS₂ · MoS₂MAE (meV): 0.46 -> 0.34Helped
Use SLEM instead of DeepH-E3 for Hamiltonian predictionGraphene · GrapheneMAE (meV): 0.40 -> 0.26Helped
Use SLEM instead of DeepH-E3 for Hamiltonian predictionSi (300K) · Si (300K)MAE (meV): 0.10 -> 0.10No clear effect
Use SLEM instead of DeepH-E3 for high-orbital Hamiltonian predictionGaN · GaNMAE (meV): 0.87 -> 0.21Helped
Use the semi-local LEM variant instead of QHnetQH-9 OOD Hamiltonian prediction · QH-9 OODHamiltonian MAE all (10⁻⁶ Eₕ): 83.22 -> 56.57Helped
Use the semi-local LEM variant instead of QHnetQH-9 OOD Hamiltonian prediction · QH-9 OODHamiltonian MAE non-diag (10⁻⁶ Eₕ): 80.26 -> 44.86Helped
Train SLEM rather than DeepH-E3 with reduced training dataHamiltonian prediction on MoS₂ and Graphene · MoS₂ and Graphene, 20%–80% training datavalidation MAE (meV)Helped
Use SO(2) convolution instead of conventional tensor productsSLEM · High-order tensor productscomputational complexity: O(l_max^6) to O(l_max^3)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MoS2 dataset graphene dataset Si MD dataset (generated) GaN MD dataset (generated) HfO2 MD dataset (generated) QH9

Benchmarks: MoS2 Hamiltonian graphene Hamiltonian Si Hamiltonian GaN Hamiltonian HfO2 Hamiltonian Si/GaN/HfO2 density and overlap matrices QH9

Metrics: MAE wall time per iteration GPU memory band structure eigenvalue MAE

Baselines: DeepH-E3 HamGNN QHnet E3NN

Builds on: Allegro DeepH-E3 SO(2) convolution (eSCN) DeePTB Slater-Koster parameterization

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy