atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Cooperative multi-agent RL

Near-Optimal Online Learning for Multi-Agent Submodular Coordination: Tight Approximation and Communication Efficiency

ICLR 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › Cooperative multi-agent RL · approach: Coordination graphs · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MA-OSMA and MA-OSEA, projection-based and projection-free multi-agent online algorithms using a multi-linear extension surrogate gradient, achieving a (1-e^{-c})/c approximation with regret O(sqrt(C_T T/(1-beta))) over connected sparse networks, validated on simulated multi-target tracking.

Problem

Multi-agent online submodular maximization where agents have disjoint action sets, limited marginal-gain feedback, and must coordinate; prior OSG gives only 1/(1+c) approximation and requires a complete communication graph.

Approach

Apply multi-linear extension with a curvature-dependent surrogate gradient (weight e^{c(z-1)}) so stationary points give (1-e^{-c})/c approximation; run decentralized mirror ascent with consensus over a connected graph, and a projection-free entropic variant with uniform mixing for KL divergence.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use the curvature-aware surrogate gradient instead of optimizing the original multilinear extensionstationary points of the multilinear extension · monotone submodular maximizationapproximation ratio: \frac{1}{1+c} -> \frac{1-e^{-c}}{c}Helped
replace OSG with MA-OSMAMA-OSM · connected communication graphapproximation ratio: \Big(\frac{1}{1+\alpha(G)}\Big) -> \Big(\frac{1-e^{-c}}{c}\Big)Helped
replace OSG with MA-OSMAmulti-target tracking · simulated scenarios with different target-type proportionsrunning average utilityHelped
replace OSG with MA-OSEAmulti-target tracking · simulated scenarios with different target-type proportionsaverage number of targets within 5 unitsHelped
use MA-OSMA or MA-OSEA instead of OSGmulti-target tracking · simulated scenarios with different target-type proportionsaverage distanceHelped
use a random graph instead of a complete graphMA-OSMA and MA-OSEA · multi-target trackingrunning average utilityNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: simulated multi-target tracking scenarios

Benchmarks: simulated multi-target tracking

Metrics: average cumulative utility average number of targets within 5 units average distance of Top-5 nearest targets

Baselines: OSG

Builds on: OSG (online sequential greedy) online mirror ascent non-oblivious search continuous greedy

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy