atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Unifying Unsupervised Graph-Level Anomaly Detection and Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Benchmark

ICLR 2025 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Graph anomaly detection · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Presents UB-GOLD, a unified benchmark that combines unsupervised graph-level anomaly detection (GLAD) and graph-level OOD detection (GLOD) across 35 datasets and 18 methods, with analyses of effectiveness, near/far-OOD sensitivity, robustness to training contamination, and efficiency.

Problem

Unsupervised graph-level anomaly detection and graph-level out-of-distribution detection have been studied separately with distinct evaluation setups, hindering cross-application and fair comparison of methods.

Approach

Unify GLAD and GLOD under a generalized graph-level OOD detection formulation and evaluate 18 unsupervised methods (two-step graph kernel/SSL with detectors and end-to-end GNN methods) on 35 datasets spanning intrinsic anomaly, class-based anomaly, inter-dataset shift and intra-dataset shift scenarios.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use end-to-end methods instead of two-step methodsGLAD/GLOD detection methods · UB-GOLD 35 datasetsaverage rankHelped
Evaluate on far-OOD rather than near-OOD samplesGLAD/GLOD detection methods · Near-OOD and far-OOD settingsAUROCHelped
Increase OOD contamination in the ID training setGLAD/GLOD detection methods · PROTEINS, BZR, and COX2AUROCHurt
Use GLADC under training-set contaminationGLAD/GLOD detection methods · All datasets under perturbationAUROCNo clear effect
Use CVTGAD under training-set contaminationGLAD/GLOD detection methods · BZR under perturbationAUROCNo clear effect
Use GLAD methods for size-based distribution shiftsGLAD methods · Size-based near/far OODAUROCHurt
Use SIGNET instead of the strongest reported methodGraph-level anomaly and OOD detection · HSEAUROC: 64.56 vs. 71.42Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Tox21 COLLAB IMDB-BINARY REDDIT-BINARY ENZYMES PROTEINS DD BZR AIDS COX2 NCI1 DHFR

Benchmarks: UB-GOLD (35 datasets)

Metrics: AUROC AUPRC FPR95

Baselines: PK-SVM PK-iF WL-SVM WL-iF IG-SVM IG-iF GCL-SVM GCL-iF OCGIN GLocalKD OCGTL SIGNET

Builds on: OpenOOD GraphCL InfoGraph GOOD benchmark

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy