Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Privacy attacks and secure learning
BrainGuard: Privacy-Preserving Multisubject Image Reconstructions from Brain Activities
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes BrainGuard, a privacy-preserving collaborative global-local framework that trains per-subject fMRI models with a shared global model and hybrid layer-wise synchronization to reconstruct images from multisubject fMRI on NSD.
Problem
Multisubject fMRI-to-image reconstruction pools all subjects' brain data, raising privacy concerns, and simple subject-specific layers (e.g., ridge regression) fail to handle individual variability.
Approach
A global-local architecture where each subject has a local model trained only on its own fMRI and a global model aggregates parameters (FedAvg-style with EMA), with a hybrid synchronization strategy: retain foundational layers, copy intermediate layers from global, and softly fuse advanced layers via learned Dynamic Fusion Learner weights.
Key results
- BrainGuard reports PixCorr 0.313 and SSIM 0.330, matching or exceeding the best prior methods on low-level metrics (MindEye, Psychometry, Brain-Diffuser).
- On high-level metrics BrainGuard reaches Inception 96.1%, CLIP 96.4%, EffNet-B 0.624 and SwAV 0.353, beating MindEye and Psychometry.
- Ablation shows applying all three synchronization parts (foundational, intermediate, advanced) gives the best results; the no-synchronization baseline reaches only PixCorr 0.163 and CLIP 86.1%.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| use the complete hybrid synchronization strategy rather than no synchronization (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .163 -> .313 | Helped |
| add intermediate-layer synchronization to foundational-layer synchronization (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .237 -> .313 | Helped |
| add intermediate-layer synchronization to foundational- and advanced-layer synchronization (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .261 -> .313 | Helped |
| set DFL layer count to 12 instead of 8 (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .313 -> .245 | Hurt |
| set DFL layer count to 10 instead of 8 (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .313 -> .257 | Hurt |
| set DFL layer count to 6 instead of 8 (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .313 -> .275 | Hurt |
| set DFL layer count to 4 instead of 8 (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .313 -> .264 | Hurt |
| set DFL layer count to 2 instead of 8 (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .313 -> .257 | Hurt |
| set DFL layer count to 1 instead of 8 (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .313 -> .245 | Hurt |
| use 8 DFL layers rather than 12 (ablation) | BrainGuard · NSD test | PixCorr: .245 -> .313 | Helped |
Surprising findings
- The ablation indicates the 8-layer DFL configuration is optimal, and both fewer and more aggregated layers perform worse.
Limitations
- Only designed for fMRI; does not address MEG or EEG.
- Focuses on visual cortex signals only, not other brain regions.
- Evaluated only on four NSD subjects with a fixed voxel mask.
Experimental setup
Datasets: Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD) MS-COCO
Benchmarks: NSD test set
Metrics: PixCorr SSIM AlexNet(2) AlexNet(5) Inception CLIP EffNet-B SwAV
Baselines: Mind-Reader Mind-Vis Takagi et al. Gu et al. Brain-Diffuser MindEye MindBridge Psychometry
Builds on: FedAvg FedALA MindBridge Versatile Diffusion SoftCLIP
Closest papers by meaning
- MindEye2: Shared-Subject Models Enable fMRI-To-Image With 1 Hour of Data (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.86)
- MindBridge: A Cross-Subject Brain Decoding Framework (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.85)
- Psychometry: An Omnifit Model for Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.85)
- Toward Generalizing Visual Brain Decoding to Unseen Subjects (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.85)
- See Through Their Minds: Learning Transferable Brain Decoding Models from Cross-Subject fMRI (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- MoRE-Brain: Routed Mixture of Experts for Interpretable and Generalizable Cross-Subject fMRI Visual Decoding (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.84)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
