atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Privacy attacks and secure learning

BrainGuard: Privacy-Preserving Multisubject Image Reconstructions from Brain Activities

AAAI 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Privacy attacks and secure learning · approach: Visual privacy and face de-identification · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes BrainGuard, a privacy-preserving collaborative global-local framework that trains per-subject fMRI models with a shared global model and hybrid layer-wise synchronization to reconstruct images from multisubject fMRI on NSD.

Problem

Multisubject fMRI-to-image reconstruction pools all subjects' brain data, raising privacy concerns, and simple subject-specific layers (e.g., ridge regression) fail to handle individual variability.

Approach

A global-local architecture where each subject has a local model trained only on its own fMRI and a global model aggregates parameters (FedAvg-style with EMA), with a hybrid synchronization strategy: retain foundational layers, copy intermediate layers from global, and softly fuse advanced layers via learned Dynamic Fusion Learner weights.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use the complete hybrid synchronization strategy rather than no synchronization (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .163 -> .313Helped
add intermediate-layer synchronization to foundational-layer synchronization (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .237 -> .313Helped
add intermediate-layer synchronization to foundational- and advanced-layer synchronization (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .261 -> .313Helped
set DFL layer count to 12 instead of 8 (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .313 -> .245Hurt
set DFL layer count to 10 instead of 8 (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .313 -> .257Hurt
set DFL layer count to 6 instead of 8 (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .313 -> .275Hurt
set DFL layer count to 4 instead of 8 (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .313 -> .264Hurt
set DFL layer count to 2 instead of 8 (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .313 -> .257Hurt
set DFL layer count to 1 instead of 8 (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .313 -> .245Hurt
use 8 DFL layers rather than 12 (ablation)BrainGuard · NSD testPixCorr: .245 -> .313Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Natural Scenes Dataset (NSD) MS-COCO

Benchmarks: NSD test set

Metrics: PixCorr SSIM AlexNet(2) AlexNet(5) Inception CLIP EffNet-B SwAV

Baselines: Mind-Reader Mind-Vis Takagi et al. Gu et al. Brain-Diffuser MindEye MindBridge Psychometry

Builds on: FedAvg FedALA MindBridge Versatile Diffusion SoftCLIP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy