atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Self-supervised and contrastive

Frequency-Guided Masking for Enhanced Vision Self-Supervised Learning

ICLR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Self-supervised and contrastive · approach: Masked autoencoder pretraining · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FOLK, a frequency-based SSL method that adaptively masks image frequencies (Com/RCom filters) and adds a self-distillation teacher branch on unmasked views, pre-training ViT and ResNet-50 on ImageNet-1K.

Problem

Frequency-masking SSL such as MFM uses fixed low/high-pass filters that make reconstruction too easy and only exposes the model to frequency-masked images, which hurts data efficiency in fine-tuning and few-shot learning.

Approach

Select masked frequencies adaptively per image via magnitude thresholds (Com retains top-magnitude frequencies, RCom removes them), and combine MFM frequency reconstruction with a DINO-style EMA teacher that sees the unmasked view, distilling its features into a student that sees the frequency-masked view.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase FOLK pre-training from 300 to 800 epochsFOLK with ViT-S/16 · ImageNet-1KTop-1 accuracy: 81.6 -> 82.1Helped
Increase FOLK pre-training from 300 to 800 epochsFOLK with ViT-B/16 · ImageNet-1KTop-1 accuracy: 83.4 -> 84.0Helped
Use FOLK instead of MFMResNet-50 · ImageNet-1K, 10% labeled dataTop-1 accuracy: 53.9 -> 71.1Helped
Use FOLK instead of MFMResNet-50 · ImageNet-1K, 1% labeled dataTop-1 accuracy: 22.7 -> 46.2Helped
Use FOLK instead of MFMResNet-50 · ImageNet-1K, full-data fine-tuningTop-1 accuracy: 80.1 -> 80.1No clear effect
Replace MFM's constant filters with Com/RCom filters (ablation)MFM, ViT-S/16 · ImageNet-1K, 10% labeled data, BLR=2e-4, WUp=0Top-1 accuracy: 57.7 -> 66.3Helped
Use FOLK instead of MFM + Com/RComViT-S/16 · ImageNet-1K, 10% labeled data, BLR=2e-4, WUp=0Top-1 accuracy: 66.3 -> 71.2Helped
Use multiple thresholds .005,.01,.05 instead of threshold .05 (ablation)Com/RCom filters · CIFAR-10Top-1 accuracy: 98.8 -> 99.1Helped
Use multiple thresholds .005,.01,.05 instead of threshold .01 (ablation)Com/RCom filters · CIFAR-100Top-1 accuracy: 90.7 -> 90.9Helped
Use thresholds .002,.01,.07 instead of .005,.01,.05 (ablation)Com/RCom filters · ImageNet-1KTop-1 accuracy: 81.6 -> 81.6No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet-1K ADE20K

Benchmarks: ImageNet-1K ADE20K CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100

Metrics: top-1 accuracy mIoU

Baselines: MAE iBOT BEiT AttMask MoCo V3 DINO MFM SimSiam MoCo v2 SimCLR BYOL SwAV

Builds on: Masked Frequency Modeling (MFM) DINO iBOT AttMask BEiT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy