atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Continual fine-tuning of LLMs

Closed-Form Merging of Parameter-Efficient Modules for Federated Continual Learning

ICLR 2025 · Continual learning › Continual fine-tuning of LLMs · approach: Synthetic data and merging for CLIP · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes LoRM, a closed-form, alternating-optimization method for merging LoRA modules via RegMean-style regression, applied to federated class-incremental learning.

Problem

Merging LoRA modules across clients and tasks in federated class-incremental learning, where the closed-form merge of LoRA's A and B matrices is indeterminate when both are unknown.

Approach

Fix one LoRA matrix (A or B) shared across clients and solve the other in closed form via RegMean; alternate which matrix is updated each communication round, and apply RegMean to full task residuals across tasks.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use LoRM instead of CCVRFCIL on ImageNet-R (β=0.5) · ImageNet-R (β=0.5)FAA: 70.00 -> 72.48Helped
Use LoRM instead of CCVRFCIL on ImageNet-A (β=0.5) · ImageNet-A (β=0.5)FAA: 36.27 -> 36.34No clear effect
Use LoRM instead of CODA-PFCIL on EuroSAT (β=1.0) · EuroSAT (β=1.0)FAA: 73.38 -> 84.23Helped
Use LoRM instead of PILoRAFCIL on CUB-200 (β=0.2) · CUB-200 (β=0.2)FAA: 60.39 -> 60.06No clear effect
Add LoRA to FedAvg (ablation)FedAvg on EuroSAT (β=1.0) · EuroSAT (β=1.0)FAA: 41.04 -> 53.14Helped
Add LoRA to FedAvg (ablation)FedAvg on ImageNet-R (β=0.5) · ImageNet-R (β=0.5)FAA: 57.65 -> 57.00No clear effect
Add alternating optimization and omit Eq. [ref] (average task-specific residuals) (ablation)RegMean baseline on ImageNet-R (β=0.5) · ImageNet-R (β=0.5)FAA: 61.18 -> 75.08Helped
Add alternating optimization and omit Eq. [ref] (average task-specific residuals) (ablation)RegMean baseline on EuroSAT (β=1.0) · EuroSAT (β=1.0)FAA: 48.74 -> 71.40Helped
Add Eq. [ref] to merge task-specific residuals (ablation)LoRM w/o Eq. on ImageNet-R (β=0.5) · ImageNet-R (β=0.5)FAA: 75.08 -> 75.62Helped
Add Eq. [ref] to merge task-specific residuals (ablation)LoRM w/o Eq. on EuroSAT (β=1.0) · EuroSAT (β=1.0)FAA: 71.40 -> 77.37Helped
Alternate training between matrices A and B rather than train only B (ablation)LoRM on EuroSAT (β=1.0) · EuroSAT (β=1.0)FAAHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-100 ImageNet-R ImageNet-A Cars-196 CUB-200 EuroSAT Out-Of-Scope

Benchmarks: CIFAR-100 ImageNet-R ImageNet-A Cars-196 CUB-200 EuroSAT Out-Of-Scope

Metrics: Final Average Accuracy (FAA)

Baselines: EWC LwF L2P CODA-Prompt FisherAvg RegMean CCVR FedProto TARGET PILoRA TIES-Merging

Builds on: RegMean LoRA PILoRA TARGET ACE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy