atlas

Research map / Image generation / Text-to-image diffusion

EC-DIT: Scaling Diffusion Transformers with Adaptive Expert-Choice Routing

ICLR 2025 · Image generation › Text-to-image diffusion · approach: Text-driven synthesis and semantic guidance · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes EC-DiT, a sparse mixture-of-experts diffusion transformer with expert-choice routing for text-to-image generation, scaled up to 97B parameters.

Problem

Scaling diffusion transformers for text-to-image generation beyond current sizes is underexplored, and standard token-choice MoE routing gives uniform per-token compute and needs load-balancing losses.

Approach

Each expert selects the top-C tokens from the whole image sequence (expert-choice routing) using router inputs that fuse text and image information via cross-attention, so compute adapts to image region complexity and denoising stage, with perfect load balance and no auxiliary loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace dense FFN layers with expert-choice routing using 32 experts3XL · GenEvalOverall: 68.92 -> 70.91Helped
Scale EC-DiT to 64 expertsEC-DiT-M · GenEvalOverall: 71.68Helped
Replace top-2 token-choice routing with expert-choice routingXL with 32 experts · GenEvalOverall: 68.52 -> 69.38Helped
Replace top-2 token-choice routing with expert-choice routingXXL with 32 experts · GenEvalOverall: 69.96 -> 70.86Helped
Replace dense FFN layers with expert-choice routingEC-DiT across model configurations · DSGOverallHelped
Increase the number of expertsEC-DiT · GenEval and DSGtext-image alignmentHelped
Use expert-choice routing instead of token-choice routingEC-DiT versus token-choice baselines · Trainingloss convergence: 200K steps; around 400K stepsHelped
Use expert-choice routing instead of token-choice routingEC-DiT · Inferenceinference overhead: 20% to 28%; less than 30%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: internal ~1.2B text-image pairs from the Internet MS-COCO 256x256 (30K samples for FID/CLIP)

Benchmarks: GenEval DSG MS-COCO FID MS-COCO CLIP Score PartiPrompts

Metrics: GenEval overall score DSG score zero-shot FID CLIP score training loss inference time

Baselines: Dense DiT (XL, XXL, 3XL, M) GShard token-choice top-2 MoE SD3-Large SD3-Large w/ DPO FLUX.1[dev] PixArt-alpha SDXL DALL-E 3 IF-XL

Builds on: expert-choice routing GShard DiT rectified flow Sparsely-gated MoE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy