atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Policy gradient and actor-critic

Augmented Lagrangian Risk-constrained Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio Optimization (Student Abstract)

AAAI 2025 · Reinforcement learning › Policy gradient and actor-critic · approach: Constrained policy optimization · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Applies an augmented Lagrangian constrained DDPG variant with a Dirichlet actor policy and a VaR cost network to portfolio optimization, reporting zero risk-constraint violations in tests.

Problem

Portfolio optimization must satisfy investor and regulator risk constraints (VaR), but standard RL portfolio methods maximize return or Sharpe ratio without hard risk constraints.

Approach

Extends DDPG with a separate cost network predicting VaR, an augmented Lagrangian actor objective enforcing the risk constraint, and a Dirichlet action distribution so asset weights sum to one.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use augmented Lagrangian risk constraints instead of unconstrained DDPGPortfolio RL · Portfolio test datasetconstraint violation number: 154 -> 0Helped
Use augmented Lagrangian risk constraints instead of unconstrained DDPGPortfolio RL · Portfolio test datasetannual average return: 40.3% -> 35.7%Hurt
Use augmented Lagrangian risk constraints instead of unconstrained DDPGPortfolio RL · Portfolio test datasetSharpe ratio: 0.2847 -> 0.3369Helped
Use augmented Lagrangian risk constraints instead of PPOPortfolio RL · Portfolio test datasetannual average return: 26.6% -> 35.7%Helped
Use augmented Lagrangian risk constraints instead of TRPOPortfolio RL · Portfolio test datasetSharpe ratio: 0.3890 -> 0.3369Hurt
Remove the Lagrangian multiplier (ablation)Proposed ALM · Portfolioperformance: 100% -> 96%Hurt
Remove the quadratic penalty (ablation)Proposed ALM · Portfolioperformance: 100% -> 94%Hurt
Remove both the Lagrangian multiplier and quadratic penalty (ablation)Proposed ALM · Portfolioperformance: 100% -> 89%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: annual average return constraint violation number Sharpe ratio

Baselines: DDPG PPO TRPO BPG

Builds on: DDPG augmented Lagrangian method TRPO PPO

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy