atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Pruning and efficient tuning

DaWin: Training-free Dynamic Weight Interpolation for Robust Adaptation

ICLR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Pruning and efficient tuning · approach: Low-rank compression and merging · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DaWin, a training-free dynamic weight interpolation method that sets per-sample interpolation coefficients from the entropy ratio of individual models and uses a Beta/Dirichlet mixture model to reduce inference cost.

Problem

Static weight interpolation (e.g., WiSE-FT, model merging) uses one global coefficient for all test samples, which limits downstream accuracy under distribution shift and in multi-task merging; existing dynamic alternatives need extra training or routers.

Approach

Estimate each model's per-sample expertise by exponentiated negative prediction entropy on unlabeled test inputs, convert it to a per-sample interpolation coefficient, and cluster coefficients with a Beta mixture (or Dirichlet for multi-task) so only K merged models are needed at inference; no training is required.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace static global interpolation with sample-wise oracle interpolationWiSE-FT · ImageNet distribution shiftsaccuracy: 51.0 -> 60.6Helped
use sample-wise entropy-based dynamic interpolation instead of static mergingCLIP ViT-B/32 robust fine-tuning · OOD averageaccuracy: 51.02 -> 54.36Helped
use sample-wise entropy-based dynamic interpolation instead of Pareto MergingCLIP ViT-B/32 multi-task learning · Multi-task averageaccuracy: 84.8 -> 86.3Helped
remove mixture modeling (ablation)DaWin · OOD averageaccuracy: 54.36 -> 54.41No clear effect
add domain-wise offset adjustment (ablation)DaWin · ImageNet IDaccuracy: 78.3 -> 78.7; 83.1 -> 83.4; 86.7 -> 86.9Helped
add domain-wise offset adjustment (ablation)DaWin · OOD averageaccuracy: 54.1 -> 54.4; 66.6 -> 66.9; 75.9 -> 76.0Helped
replace entropy with pseudo-label expertise metrics (ablation)DaWin · ImageNet ID and OODaccuracyMixed
vary the sample size used to fit the Beta mixture model (ablation)DaWin on ImageNet and distribution shifts · ImageNet and OOD averageaccuracy: 78.55 / 54.30; 78.69 / 54.27; 78.71 / 54.27; 78.70 / 54.28; 78.70 / 54.25; 78.71 / 54.24; 78.67 / 54.26; 78.70 / 54.36No clear effect
remove mixture modeling (ablation)DaWin · ImageNet IDaccuracy: 78.70 -> 78.71No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet-1K ImageNet-V2 ImageNet-R ImageNet-A ImageNet-Sketch ObjectNet SUN397 Cars RESISC45 EuroSAT SVHN GTSRB

Benchmarks: ImageNet-1K ImageNet-V2 ImageNet-R ImageNet-A ImageNet-Sketch ObjectNet SUN397 Cars RESISC45 EuroSAT SVHN GTSRB

Metrics: top-1 accuracy average OOD accuracy wall-clock inference time mean squared error of coefficients

Baselines: ZS FT WiSE-FT Output ensemble Uniform Soup Greedy Soup Model Stock LP-FT CAR-FT FLYP Lipsum-FT CaRot

Builds on: WiSE-FT Task Arithmetic AdaMerging Model Soups dynamic classifier selection

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy