atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Point cloud classification

ConcreTizer: Model Inversion Attack via Occupancy Classification and Dispersion Control for 3D Point Cloud Restoration

ICLR 2025 · Point clouds › Point cloud classification · approach: Adversarial point cloud attacks

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ConcreTizer, a model inversion attack that restores 3D LiDAR point cloud scenes from voxel-based feature extractor outputs by classifying voxel occupancy and supervising block-wise to control VoI dispersion.

Problem

Model inversion attacks on voxel-based 3D point cloud feature extractors in autonomous vehicles, where zero-padded empty voxels are ambiguous and non-empty voxels disperse through convolution layers, causing conventional point regression to fail.

Approach

Reframe point restoration as per-voxel occupancy classification (with sigmoid focal loss) instead of coordinate regression, and split the inversion network at downsampling layers into blocks trained with block-wise supervision (Dispersion-Controlled Supervision) so that VoI spread is contained and masked at each stage.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use voxel occupancy classification instead of point regression (ablation)ConcreTizer inversion attack · KITTI and Waymorestoration performanceHelped
Use Sigmoid Focal loss instead of BCE loss for occupancy classification (ablation)ConcreTizer VOC · KITTI, deeper feature layersrestoration performanceHelped
Add dispersion-controlled supervision to VOC (ablation)ConcreTizer · KITTI, deeper feature layersrestoration performanceHelped
Use 10 DCS instances instead of no partitioning (ablation)ConcreTizer · KITTIrestoration performanceHurt
Use downsampling-aligned partitioning with 2, 3, or 4 DCS instances instead of 10 (ablation)ConcreTizer · KITTIrestoration performanceHelped
Use ConcreTizer instead of UltraLiDAR3D point cloud restoration · KITTI and Waymo3D object detection accuracy: 58.32 -> 66.25; 56.08 -> 59.48; 59.00 -> 64.27; 54.19 -> 65.03; 0.2328 -> 0.4245; 0.1602 -> 0.4369; 0.2179 -> 0.4100; 0.Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: KITTI Waymo

Benchmarks: KITTI Waymo

Metrics: Chamfer Distance Hausdorff Distance F1 score AP_3D APH

Baselines: Point Regression UltraLiDAR VOC (BCE loss)

Builds on: Point Regression inversion Sigmoid Focal loss OpenPCDet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy