atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

How to Verify Any (Reasonable) Distribution Property: Computationally Sound Argument Systems for Distributions

ICLR 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Sample complexity · approach: Sample complexity of ranking and selection · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Builds a computationally sound 4-message interactive argument that lets a verifier with only sampling access check that an unknown distribution is close to any polynomial-time-decidable property, using ~sqrt(N)/eps^2 samples and communication via CRH-based succinct distribution commitments and IAPs.

Problem

Verifying, without replicating the analysis, that an unknown distribution (accessible only via samples) is close to having a claimed distribution property, with sublinear samples, communication and verifier time.

Approach

A prover commits to a distribution via a CRH-based hash tree (succinct distribution-commitment with local openings for pdf, cdf, quantile, sampling); the verifier runs an identity tester against the committed distribution using samples from D, and an interactive argument of proximity over the sorted-grain string representation verifies the property decision in polynomial time.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use a prover and the proposed argument system instead of standalone testingVerification of efficiently decidable distribution properties · Distribution properties over [N]verifier sample complexity: \widetilde{O}(\sqrt{N}/\rho^2) \cdot {\sf poly}(\kappa) vs. \Omega(N/\log(N))Helped
Use the proposed protocol rather than replicating the analysisProperties whose standalone analysis requires quasi-linear sample complexity and running time · Distribution properties over [N]verification efficiency: quadratic speedupHelped
Use the proposed argument system instead of the Chiesa and Gur protocolGeneral distribution properties · General distribution propertiescommunication complexity: \widetilde{O}(\sqrt{N}/\rho^2) vs. quasi-linearHelped
Use the proposed argument system instead of the Chiesa and Gur protocolGeneral distribution properties · General distribution propertiesverification time: \widetilde{O}(\sqrt{N}/\rho^2) vs. quasi-linearHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: sample complexity communication complexity verifier runtime

Baselines: Chiesa and Gur non-interactive protocol Herman and Rothblum label-invariant protocols

Builds on: interactive arguments of proximity Chiesa and Gur unconditionally sound distribution protocol Herman and Rothblum label-invariant protocols Kilian 4-message argument

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy