atlas

Research map / Image generation / Text-to-image diffusion

Refine-by-Align: Reference-Guided Artifacts Refinement through Semantic Alignment

ICLR 2025 · Image generation › Text-to-image diffusion · approach: Multi-subject personalization · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Refine-by-Align, a diffusion-based two-stage (alignment + refinement) model that uses cross-attention correspondence to refine localized artifacts in generated images using a reference image, without test-time tuning.

Problem

Personalized or reference-guided generated images often contain localized artifacts (e.g., incorrect logos, text, fine textures) that reduce identity fidelity; prior artifact refinement methods lack reference-guided control and handle arbitrary-shaped regions poorly.

Approach

Uses diffusion cross-attention maps between the artifact-region query and DINOv2 reference tokens to locate the corresponding reference region (alignment), then reuses the same network with that region as reference to inpaint the artifact (refinement); trained self-supervised on Pixabay and MVObj.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use Refine-by-Align instead of PALGenArtifactBench artifact refinement · GenArtifactBenchCLIP-T: 25.8906 -> 25.4063Hurt
use Refine-by-Align instead of MimicBrushGenArtifactBench artifact refinement · GenArtifactBenchCLIP-I: 85.0625 -> 86.6250Helped
use Refine-by-Align instead of ObjectStitchGenArtifactBench artifact refinement · GenArtifactBenchDINO-I: 72.6152 -> 75.3135Helped
use Refine-by-Align instead of Paint-by-ExampleGenArtifactBench artifact refinement · GenArtifactBenchIdentity preference win rate: 70.83% vs 29.17%Helped
use Refine-by-Align instead of Paint-by-ExampleGenArtifactBench artifact refinement · GenArtifactBenchRealism preference win rate: 71.67% vs 28.33%Helped
add refinement-mode training to alignment-mode training (ablation)Refine-by-Align · GenArtifactBenchCLIP-T: 24.4375 -> 25.4063Helped
add refinement-mode training to alignment-mode training (ablation)Refine-by-Align · GenArtifactBenchCLIP-I: 84.5000 -> 86.6250Helped
add refinement-mode training to alignment-mode training (ablation)Refine-by-Align · GenArtifactBenchDINO: 71.7609 -> 75.3135Helped
use DINOv2 instead of CLIP as the visual encoder (ablation)Refine-by-Align · GenArtifactBenchCLIP-T: 24.3750 -> 25.4063Helped
use DINOv2 instead of CLIP as the visual encoder (ablation)Refine-by-Align · GenArtifactBenchCLIP-I: 84.3750 -> 86.6250Helped
use DINOv2 instead of CLIP as the visual encoder (ablation)Refine-by-Align · GenArtifactBenchDINO: 70.7714 -> 75.3135Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Pixabay MVObj DreamBooth PAL artifacts dataset

Benchmarks: GenArtifactBench

Metrics: CLIP-T CLIP-I DINO-I user preference win rate mIoU

Baselines: Paint-by-Example ObjectStitch AnyDoor PAL Cross-Image Attention MimicBrush DIFT DHF

Builds on: AnyDoor IMPRINT Stable Diffusion DINOv2 zoom-in inpainting

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy