atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

MADGEN: Mass-Spec attends to De Novo Molecular generation

ICLR 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Structure-based 3D molecule generation · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MADGEN, a two-stage de novo molecule generator that retrieves a Murcko scaffold from an MS/MS spectrum via contrastive ranking and then generates the full molecule from that scaffold using a spectrum-conditioned graph-transformer Markov bridge with classifier-free guidance.

Problem

De novo annotation of MS/MS spectra into molecular structures is very hard because of huge chemical diversity and limited reference databases; direct generation over the full molecular space is intractable.

Approach

Decompose de novo generation into scaffold retrieval (contrastive spectrum-scaffold alignment) and scaffold-conditioned generation, where spectral peaks are tokenized, self-attended, and injected via cross-attention plus classifier-free guidance into a discrete Markov bridge over edges.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the oracle correct-scaffold retriever instead of the predictive retrieverMADGEN · NIST23Top-1 accuracy: 4.6% -> 49.0%Helped
Use the oracle correct-scaffold retriever instead of the predictive retrieverMADGEN · CANOPUSTop-1 accuracy: 2.10% -> 18.7%Helped
Use the oracle correct-scaffold retriever instead of the predictive retrieverMADGEN · MassSpecGymTop-1 accuracy: 1.31% -> 10.5%Helped
Replace tokenization + self-attention and cross-attention with binning + MLP and concatenation (ablation)MADGEN oracle scaffold generation · NISTAccuracy: 49.0% -> 4.30%Hurt
Remove self-attention from spectral tokenization (ablation)MADGEN oracle scaffold generation · NISTAccuracy: 49.0% -> 13.0%Hurt
Remove CFG while retaining tokenization, self-attention, and cross-attention (ablation)MADGEN oracle scaffold generation · NISTAccuracy: 49.0% -> 42.5%Hurt
Apply CFG to edges only rather than nodes only (ablation)MADGEN oracle scaffold generation · NISTAccuracy: 49.0% -> 42.0%Hurt
Apply CFG to both nodes and edges rather than nodes only (ablation)MADGEN oracle scaffold generation · NISTAccuracy: 49.0% -> 45.9%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NIST23 CANOPUS MassSpecGym

Benchmarks: NIST23 CANOPUS MassSpecGym

Metrics: top-1 accuracy top-10 accuracy Tanimoto similarity MCES scaffold prediction accuracy

Baselines: Spec2Mol MSNovelist MassGenie SMILES Transformer SELFIES Transformer Random generation

Builds on: CLIP JESTR RetroBridge classifier-free guidance Spec2Mol

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy