atlas

Research map / Video / Video generation

Pyramidal Flow Matching for Efficient Video Generative Modeling

ICLR 2025 · Video › Video generation · approach: Autoregressive long video generation · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Pyramidal Flow Matching, a unified single-DiT flow-matching framework with spatial and temporal pyramids that generates up to 10-second 768p videos at 24 FPS with reduced training cost.

Problem

Video generation requires modeling a huge spatiotemporal space, making training computationally and data intensive; cascaded pipelines reduce cost but use separate models per resolution, hindering knowledge sharing and flexibility.

Approach

Reinterpret the denoising trajectory as pyramid stages where only the last stage runs at full resolution, linking stages with a piecewise flow matching objective trained jointly in one DiT, with renoising at jump points during inference, plus an autoregressive temporal pyramid that compresses full-resolution history.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use spatial pyramidal flow instead of standard flow matching (ablation)Text-to-image generation · MS-COCO (3K prompts)FID convergenceHelped
use a temporal pyramid of compressed history instead of full-sequence diffusion (ablation)Video generation · Video generation ablationVisual quality and temporal consistencyHelped
add corrective Gaussian noise at spatial pyramid stage jumps (ablation)Pyramidal flow matching · High-resolution image generationVisual detailHelped
use blockwise causal attention instead of bidirectional attention (ablation)Autoregressive video generation · 1-second video generationTemporal coherenceHelped
use Pyramidal Flow Matching instead of Gen-3 AlphaVideo generation · VBenchQuality Score: 84.11 -> 84.74Helped
use Pyramidal Flow Matching instead of T2V-TurboVideo generation · VBenchSemantic Score: 74.76 -> 69.62Hurt
use Pyramidal Flow Matching instead of Gen-2Video generation · EvalCrafterFinal Sum Score: 254 -> 244Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LAION-5B CC-12M SA-1B JourneyDB WebVid-10M OpenVid-1M Open-Sora Plan videos MSR-VTT MS-COCO

Benchmarks: VBench EvalCrafter MS-COCO MSR-VTT

Metrics: VBench total score quality score semantic score motion smoothness dynamic degree EvalCrafter final sum score FID FVD user preference

Baselines: CogVideoX-2B CogVideoX-5B Open-Sora 1.2 Open-Sora Plan v1.3 VideoCrafter2 T2V-Turbo Kling Gen-3 Alpha Gen-2 Pika 1.0 ModelScope Show-1

Builds on: flow matching SD3 Medium MM-DiT MAGVIT-v2 piecewise flow Patch n' Pack

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy